2019
DOI: 10.1134/s1061934819030043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solid-Phase Extraction of Organic Substances: Unconventional Methods and Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was introduced in 1990 to overcome the major drawbacks of conventional SPE, including complexity in automation and instrument design [ 17 ]. This method eliminates the need for organic solvents and significantly shortens the analysis time [ 18 ]. SPME has gained wide attention due to its advantages, such as high sensitivity, solvent-free methods, and simplicity of operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was introduced in 1990 to overcome the major drawbacks of conventional SPE, including complexity in automation and instrument design [ 17 ]. This method eliminates the need for organic solvents and significantly shortens the analysis time [ 18 ]. SPME has gained wide attention due to its advantages, such as high sensitivity, solvent-free methods, and simplicity of operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SPE method is widely in demand due to the possibility of its modification, for example, using coordination polymers (CPs) capable of interacting with antibiotics and forming supramolecular complexes, about which not much is known, and which are capable of luminescence under certain conditions [19]. In addition, the SPE method can be easily automated for fast and on-line analyses since it can be combined with gas or liquid chromatography, photoluminescence [19] and other analytical methods [19,20]. SPE is widely in demand due to the possibility of its automation and ease of combination with gas and liquid chromatography, as well as other analytical methods [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the SPE method can be easily automated for fast and on-line analyses since it can be combined with gas or liquid chromatography, photoluminescence [19] and other analytical methods [19,20]. SPE is widely in demand due to the possibility of its automation and ease of combination with gas and liquid chromatography, as well as other analytical methods [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over the years, a number of sample preparation methods have been developed, such as liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) ( Hammad et al, 2021 ), solid-phase extraction (SPE) ( Fedotov et al, 2019 ), and dispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE) ( Khashaba et al, 2021 ; Salehpour et al, 2021 ) as well as microextraction techniques including dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) ( Rezaee et al, 2006 ; Zuloaga et al, 2015 ; Mansour and Khairy, 2017 ; Wu et al, 2019 ), solid-phase microextraction (SPME) ( Hawthorne et al, 1992 ; Duman et al, 2020 ; Jagirani and Soylak, 2020 ), and single-drop microextraction (SDME) ( Liu and Dasgupta, 1996 ; Choi et al, 2011 ; Delove Tegladza et al, 2020 ). DLLME is one of the most efficient methods for the separation and preconcentration of analytes due to its ease of operation and low cost ( Moslemzadeh et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%