Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3460231.3478861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soliciting User Preferences in Conversational Recommender Systems via Usage-related Questions

Abstract: Conversational Recommender Systems are recommender systems that utilize multi-turn interactions in order to help users find items of interest. Their advantage over traditional, one-shot recommender systems lies in their ability to elicit and adapt to the changing user preference in real time.Common approaches to eliciting user preferences include asking about items and item attributes. This strategies can fail, if the user does not have the prerequisite knowledge about the item or item attributes but they know… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models proposed in this paper are unique in modeling the user intent, and they can be baselines for future research in this area, since the current conversational and exploratory search models [51,64,85] are not applicable to tackle the described task. For convenience, we Algorithm 3 Algorithm to generate corpus for evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The models proposed in this paper are unique in modeling the user intent, and they can be baselines for future research in this area, since the current conversational and exploratory search models [51,64,85] are not applicable to tackle the described task. For convenience, we Algorithm 3 Algorithm to generate corpus for evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent advances in the field of Natural Language Understanding (NLU) [1,14,28] have enabled natural language interfaces to help users find information beyond what typical search engines provide, through systems such as open domain and task-oriented dialogue engines [58,59] and conversational recommenders [19], among others. However, most existing systems still present with one or both of the following limitations: (1) answers are typically constrained to relatively simple and primarily factoid-style requests in natural language [54,81], as is the case with search engines; and (2) a requirement on availability of inferred user preferences [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of literally no user data, an initial preference elicitation step is carried out with interactive recommendation approaches. These approaches can apply several channels for the acquisition of user knowledge, such as demographic filtering (Adomavicius & Tuzhilin, 2005), presenting a set of features or contexts to be selected (Druck, Settles, & McCallum, 2009;Khan, Smyth, & Coyle, 2021), providing a set of example recommendations to be labeled (Pecune, Callebert, & Marsella, 2020), and question-based preference elicitation (Buzcu et al, 2022;Kostric, Balog, & Radlinski, 2021) or intent detection via intelligent dialogue systems (Liu, Li, & Lin, 2019). An initial interaction phase with the user supply data that enable the execution of subsequent recommendation models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such considerations can be implemented both in traditional interactive sales advisory solutions (Widyantoro and Baizal 2014;Jannach 2004), but also in modern approaches based on machine learning. In a recent work Kostric et al (2021) present a promising approach for generating what they call implicit questions, which may help advance natural-language based systems beyond today's predominant slot-filling approaches. Furthermore, Radlinski et al (2022) investigate challenges of understanding and modeling subjective attributes to overcome limitations of traditional slot-filling techniques.…”
Section: Understanding User Expectations and Realistic Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%