2021
DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01258-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soliciting judgments of forgetting reactively enhances memory as well as making judgments of learning: Empirical and meta-analytic tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, requesting judgments of learning (JOLs) in which learners predict their memory performance during study alters memory performance (for review, see Double & Birney, 2019). Several studies showed that the mere act of making JOLs for word pairs and single words influences cued-recall (Janes, Rivers, et al, 2018; Mitchum et al, 2016; Soderstrom et al, 2015), free-recall (Senkova & Otani, 2021), and recognition memory performance (Li et al, 2022; Myers et al, 2020).…”
Section: Reactivity Of Immediate Jolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, requesting judgments of learning (JOLs) in which learners predict their memory performance during study alters memory performance (for review, see Double & Birney, 2019). Several studies showed that the mere act of making JOLs for word pairs and single words influences cued-recall (Janes, Rivers, et al, 2018; Mitchum et al, 2016; Soderstrom et al, 2015), free-recall (Senkova & Otani, 2021), and recognition memory performance (Li et al, 2022; Myers et al, 2020).…”
Section: Reactivity Of Immediate Jolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study is the first to explore electrophysiological correlates of the JOL reactivity effect. As previously mentioned, behavioral research suggested that both enhanced learning engagement (Tauber and Witherby 2019;Tekin and Roediger 2020;Witherby and Tauber 2017;Zhao et al 2022) and elaborative processing (Li et al 2022;Soderstrom et al 2015;Tekin and Roediger 2020;Zechmeister and Shaughnessy 1980) may contribute to the JOL reactivity effect. Accordingly, regarding the electrophysiological correlates of the reactivity effect, we predicted that components of ERP waveforms related to attentional (e.g., P200) and elaborative processing (e.g., LPC) would be related to the magnitude of the JOL reactivity effect.…”
Section: Cognitive Neural Indicators Associated With the Reactivity E...mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Another possible explanation for JOL reactivity is the elaborative processing account, which assumes that making JOLs enhances retention by inducing more elaborative processing (Li et al 2022;Soderstrom et al 2015;Tekin and Roediger 2020;Zechmeister and Shaughnessy 1980). Specifically, making item-by-item JOLs may drive participants to adopt more elaborative study strategies to process the study items, which in turn produces a positive reactivity effect (Mitchum et al 2016;Sahakyan et al 2004).…”
Section: Putative Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A set of previous studies has explored the reactivity effect on word list learning, and the documented findings suggest that the effect tends to be moderated by test format. For instance, previous studies showed that making JOLs substantially enhances recognition of word lists (Li et al, 2021; Yang et al, 2015; Zhao et al, 2022), whereas it has a minimal reactive influence on free recall (Stevens, 2019; Tauber & Rhodes, 2012).…”
Section: Reactivity Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%