2018
DOI: 10.1108/ssmt-12-2017-0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solder joint inspection using eigensolder features

Abstract: Purpose The authors propose a solder joint recognition method based on eigenspace technology. Design/methodology/approach The original solder joint image is transformed into a small set of feature subspace called “eigensolder”, which is the eigenvector of the training set and can represent a solder joint well. Then, the eigensolder feature is extracted by projecting the new solder joint image into the subspace, and the Euclidean distance measure is used to classify the solder joint. Findings The experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate our proposed method, we compare it with some state-of-the-art inspection methods, which are SAM (Xie et al, 2009), SDL (Wu and Zhang, 2011), ViBe-based (Cai et al, 2015) and RPCA-based (Cai et al, 2017;Song et al, 2019;and Wu and Xu, 2018). The comparison results are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparisons With the State-of-the-art Inspection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To validate our proposed method, we compare it with some state-of-the-art inspection methods, which are SAM (Xie et al, 2009), SDL (Wu and Zhang, 2011), ViBe-based (Cai et al, 2015) and RPCA-based (Cai et al, 2017;Song et al, 2019;and Wu and Xu, 2018). The comparison results are shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Comparisons With the State-of-the-art Inspection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons are that a single Gaussian model is not able to represent the distribution of the pixels in the image sequence and susceptible to shifts inherently in the structures of IC solder joints. Song et al (2019) and Wu and Xu (2018) both achieve large omission rates and relatively small error rates. Song et al (2019) used the binary sub-images segmented from the solder joint image for training the SVM.…”
Section: Comparisons With the State-of-the-art Inspection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Common defect detection methods for electronic components based on machine vision can be divided into the following categories (Xie et al, 2007), namely, feature-based methods, machine learning-based methods and deep learning-based methods that have emerged in recent years. Common featurebased methods include wavelet transform (Cho et al, 2010;Acciani et al, 2006) and principal component analysis (Wu et al, 2018;Matsushima et al, 2010). For machine learning-based methods, there are neural networks (Hao et al, 2013;Giaquinto et al, 2009), decision trees (Hongwei et al, 2011) and support vector machines (Song et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%