2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2003.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar wind—magnetosphere–ionosphere coupling: an event study based on Freja data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These questionable parts should only have a minor impact on the final result and will not affect the general trend. For orbits that do not pass through the global maximum and minimum potential areas the potential contribution from the low‐latitude dynamo will be underestimated, as argued by Blomberg et al [2004]. The total low‐latitude contribution and the true cross‐polar potential could thus be slightly higher than measured here, but in general we expect them to be representative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These questionable parts should only have a minor impact on the final result and will not affect the general trend. For orbits that do not pass through the global maximum and minimum potential areas the potential contribution from the low‐latitude dynamo will be underestimated, as argued by Blomberg et al [2004]. The total low‐latitude contribution and the true cross‐polar potential could thus be slightly higher than measured here, but in general we expect them to be representative.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“… Newell et al [1991b] made a few observations of the LLBL potential that ranged between 3 and 15 kV, with the average around 5 kV. In a more recent study, Blomberg et al [2004] presented observational evidence that the low‐latitude dynamo could sometimes generate as much as a third of the potential for southward IMF conditions. In this paper we present the first statistical study of the sources that contribute to the cross polar potential, as all previous estimates have either been analytical or based on a limited set of observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Previous estimates of the boundary layer potential, based either on case studies or less extensive datasets [e.g., Sonnerup, 1980;Mozer, 1984;Newell et al, 1991;Lu et al, 1994], have in general derived values of the order of 5 -10 kV, with the exception of a study by Blomberg et al [2004] which indicated the existence of higher boundary layer potentials (the selected events were all from active times likely related to southward IMF). None of the studies above have treated IMF related effects to any large extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%