2018
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201805027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Water Splitting with a Hydrogenase Integrated in Photoelectrochemical Tandem Cells

Abstract: Hydrogenases (H2ases) are benchmark electrocatalysts for H2 production, both in biology and (photo)catalysis in vitro. We report the tailoring of a p‐type Si photocathode for optimal loading and wiring of H2ase through the introduction of a hierarchical inverse opal (IO) TiO2 interlayer. This proton‐reducing Si|IO‐TiO2|H2ase photocathode is capable of driving overall water splitting in combination with a photoanode. We demonstrate unassisted (bias‐free) water splitting by wiring Si|IO‐TiO2|H2ase to a modified … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the most selective polymer toward CO production, P2 1 was immobilized on a p ‐type Si (Si) semiconductor electrode for photoelectrochemical CO 2 reduction. This was enabled by interfacing a compatible IO‐TiO 2 layer with light‐harvesting Si as previously reported . Linear sweep voltammograms under chopped illumination were conducted on the Si|IO‐TiO 2 | P2 1 photocathode in the same electrolyte solution as that used for the Ti|IO‐TiO 2 | P2 1 cathodes (Supporting Information, Figure S19a).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 87%
“…As the most selective polymer toward CO production, P2 1 was immobilized on a p ‐type Si (Si) semiconductor electrode for photoelectrochemical CO 2 reduction. This was enabled by interfacing a compatible IO‐TiO 2 layer with light‐harvesting Si as previously reported . Linear sweep voltammograms under chopped illumination were conducted on the Si|IO‐TiO 2 | P2 1 photocathode in the same electrolyte solution as that used for the Ti|IO‐TiO 2 | P2 1 cathodes (Supporting Information, Figure S19a).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This was enabled by interfacing ac ompatible IO-TiO 2 layer with light-harvesting Si as previously reported. [18] Linear sweep voltammograms under chopped illumination were conducted on the Si j IO-TiO 2 j P2 1 photocathode in the same electrolyte solution as that used for the Ti j IO-TiO 2 j P2 1 cathodes (Supporting Information, Figure S19a). Ap hotocurrent onset at À0.5 Vv s. Fc + /Fc 0 and density of À450 mAcm À2 at À1.0 V vs.F c + /Fc 0 were observed, which compares favorably to the À150 mAcm À2 achieved by apolymer-free Si j IO-TiO 2 control electrode.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ap hotocurrent onset at À0.5 Vv s. Fc + /Fc 0 and density of À450 mAcm À2 at À1.0 V vs.F c + /Fc 0 were observed, which compares favorably to the À150 mAcm À2 achieved by apolymer-free Si j IO-TiO 2 control electrode. [18] Controlled potential photoelectrolysis at À1.0 V vs.F c + /Fc 0 under irradiation (100 mW cm À2 ,A M1.5 G, l > 400 nm) on the Si j IO-TiO 2 j P2 1 electrode produced CO at about 80 %product selectivity over 6h(Supporting Information, Figure S19b,c). Thelow FE is coherent with the electrocatalysis results and highlights the need for am ore inert or conductive polymer backbone and/or more efficient electron transfer between the surface and the polymer.N either the catalyst-free Si j IO-TiO 2 photoelectrode under CO 2 nor Si j IO-TiO 2 j P2 1 under N 2 produced detectable amounts of CO or H 2 (Supporting Information, Figure S19b).…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thei nteraction of FDH and TiO 2 was quantitatively investigated with apreviously described QCM cell. [18,19] Upon flowing an FDH-containing solution over a planarTiO 2covered quartz chip (12 nm in 100 mm TEOA), the surface of TiO 2 reached saturation after 1h,r esulting in approximately 3.5 pmol cm À2 of adsorbed FDH (planarTiO 2 j FDH, Figure 3A). Thestrength of the enzyme-TiO 2 interaction was…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%