2014
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar steam generation by heat localization

Abstract: Currently, steam generation using solar energy is based on heating bulk liquid to high temperatures. This approach requires either costly high optical concentrations leading to heat loss by the hot bulk liquid and heated surfaces or vacuum. New solar receiver concepts such as porous volumetric receivers or nanofluids have been proposed to decrease these losses. Here we report development of an approach and corresponding material structure for solar steam generation while maintaining low optical concentration a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

21
1,323
3
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,681 publications
(1,354 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
21
1,323
3
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, conventional techniques for generating solar vapor typically rely on costly and cumbersome optical concentration systems to enable bulk heating of a liquid, resulting in relatively low efficiencies (e.g., 30–40%) due to heat absorption throughout the entire liquid volume that is not directly translated into vapor production. Recently, various advanced and expensive metallic plasmonic5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and carbon‐based nanomaterials14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 have been explored for use in solar vapor/steam generation. However, the vaporization efficiencies of these reported structures are still relatively low under 1 sun illumination (e.g., from 48%10 to 83%21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, conventional techniques for generating solar vapor typically rely on costly and cumbersome optical concentration systems to enable bulk heating of a liquid, resulting in relatively low efficiencies (e.g., 30–40%) due to heat absorption throughout the entire liquid volume that is not directly translated into vapor production. Recently, various advanced and expensive metallic plasmonic5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and carbon‐based nanomaterials14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 have been explored for use in solar vapor/steam generation. However, the vaporization efficiencies of these reported structures are still relatively low under 1 sun illumination (e.g., from 48%10 to 83%21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the widely used definition of the solar energy conversion efficiency (e.g., refs. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 26, 30) is obviously not applicable in this transient process since there is no solar input. Therefore, the physical picture of the solar‐driven evaporation should be revisited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, interfacial solar steam/vapor generation is attracting a lot of attention for achieving high energy transfer efficiency. And various optical and thermal designs at the solar absorber–water interface for potential applications in water purification,10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 seawater desalination,24, 25, 26, 27 and power generation28, 29 appear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transpiration‐induced mass changes as a function of time for the three samples are recorded with dark transpiration totally subtracted, as shown in Figure 3 a. In analogy to the interfacial solar vapor generation process, the transpiration efficiency (η) of plant can be defined as10, 15 ηTransp=m˙hLVqsolarwhere truem˙ is the transpiration rate, h LV is the latent enthalpy of the liquid–vapor phase change, and q solar is the solar irradiation (≈300 W m −2 ). Figure 3b shows the measured transpiration rate (truem˙) and efficiency (η Transp ) for three states of the same one leaf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation