2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/6204382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Radiation Models and Gridded Databases to Fill Gaps in Weather Series and to Project Climate Change in Brazil

Abstract: e quantification of climate change impacts on several human activities depends on reliable weather data series, without gaps and long enough to build up future climate. Based on that, this study aimed to evaluate the performance of temperature-based models for estimating global solar radiation and gridded databases (AgCFSR, AgMERRA, NASA/POWER, and XAVIER) as alternative ways for filling gaps in historical weather series in Brazil and to project climate change scenarios based on measured and gridded weather d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Budyko hypothesis (Budyko, 1948(Budyko, , 1974 considers that the ratio between the long-term annual actual evapotranspiration (ET) and precipitation (P ) is a function of the ratio between the long-term potential evapotranspiration (PET) and precipitation (P ). The Budyko framework has been used to assess global impacts of climate change on water resources (Berghuijs et al, 2017;Roderick et al, 2014) and to gain further insight into the water balance controls at mean annual timescales (Donohue et al, 2007;Berghuijs et al, 2017;Meira Neto et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Budyko hypothesis (Budyko, 1948(Budyko, , 1974 considers that the ratio between the long-term annual actual evapotranspiration (ET) and precipitation (P ) is a function of the ratio between the long-term potential evapotranspiration (PET) and precipitation (P ). The Budyko framework has been used to assess global impacts of climate change on water resources (Berghuijs et al, 2017;Roderick et al, 2014) and to gain further insight into the water balance controls at mean annual timescales (Donohue et al, 2007;Berghuijs et al, 2017;Meira Neto et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other uses of this dataset include the evaluation of precipitation from downscaled-global circulation models (Almagro et al, 2020), as well as other meteorological variables used in regional studies (Battisti et al, 2019;Bender and Sentelhas, 2018; https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-2020-521 Preprint. Discussion started: 14 October 2020 c Author(s) 2020.…”
Section: Comparison With the Camels-br And Broader Implications For Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily air maximum and minimum temperatures, accumulated thermal time during the sugarcane cycle, and solar radiation (daily and accumulated) data from XAVIER and NASA presented a satisfactory performance compared to MWD at the four assessed sugarcane growing regions (Tables 1 and 3). The satisfactory quality of solar radiation and temperature data of GWD has been shown in many studies in Brazil (Battisti et al, 2019;Bender and Sentelhas, 2018;Duarte and Sentelhas, 2020;Monteiro et al, 2018;Valeriano et al, 2018) and around the world (Bai et al, 2010;Mourtzinis et al, 2017;Ojeda et al, 2017;Van Wart et al, 2013a;White et al, 2011). It is not surprising that key phenological stages of annual crops were well simulated with GWD in thermal time-dependent crop models (Battisti et al, 2019;Mourtzinis et al, 2017;van Bussel et al, 2011), similar to what was found in this study for the total number of sugarcane leaves, which is an important canopy development state variable of the APSIM-Sugar model (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…seasonal weather data and their impacts on crop yield simulations were assessed recently in Brazil (Battisti et al, 2019;Bender and Sentelhas, 2018;Duarte and Sentelhas, 2020;Monteiro et al, 2018;Valeriano et al, 2018). A common issue was the poor performance of rainfall predictions, even when data were aggregated at a 10-day scale, affecting negatively crop yield simulations in many sites assessed by Monteiro et al (2018) and Battisti et al (2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%