2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar-Powered Carbon Fixation for Food and Feed Production Using Microorganisms—A Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis

Abstract: This study evaluates the techno-economic feasibility of five solar-powered concepts for the production of autotrophic microorganisms for food and feed production; the main focus is on three concepts based on hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria (HOB), which are further compared to two microalgae-related concepts. Two locations with markedly different solar conditions are considered (Finland and Morocco), in which Morocco was found to be the most economically competitive for the cultivation of microalgae in open ponds a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To meet the calorie needs of astronauts in future Long-duration Exploration Missions (LDEMs), where re-supply will be extremely challenging, novel in-flight food production systems may serve to reduce the mass and volume of food that must be launched and stored with the crew. Technologies that could be the basis of such systems include the direct culture of animal cells (‘cultivated’ or ‘cultured’ meat) 29 , the use of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria, and the cultivation of microalgae 30 . Protein is the major output of such systems and, given that the protein requirement for female and male astronauts is currently 0.8-g·kg −1 body mass 31 , a ‘smaller’ crew would, therefore, reduce system requirements (to meet daily protein need) and system resources (to meet the total mission protein requirement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To meet the calorie needs of astronauts in future Long-duration Exploration Missions (LDEMs), where re-supply will be extremely challenging, novel in-flight food production systems may serve to reduce the mass and volume of food that must be launched and stored with the crew. Technologies that could be the basis of such systems include the direct culture of animal cells (‘cultivated’ or ‘cultured’ meat) 29 , the use of hydrogen-oxidizing bacteria, and the cultivation of microalgae 30 . Protein is the major output of such systems and, given that the protein requirement for female and male astronauts is currently 0.8-g·kg −1 body mass 31 , a ‘smaller’ crew would, therefore, reduce system requirements (to meet daily protein need) and system resources (to meet the total mission protein requirement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The required nutrient supply to the fermentor can be approximated by the growth stoichiometry of C. necator, represented as ,, 4.09 normalC normalO 2 + 0.76 normalN normalH 3 + 21.36 H 2 + 6.21 O 2 C 4.09 H 7.13 O 1.89 N 0.76 + 18.70 H 2 normalO …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Moreover, other examples in the literature that report economic parameters for SCP as food or feed do not consider other competitors in the market. 16,17 In contrast, the techno-economic analysis reported herein studies the economic viability of SCP as an animal feed protein supplement to replace fishmeal or soybean meal in the current market. Specifically, the study evaluates SCP production via gas fermentation using carbon dioxide captured from corn ethanol production and hydrogen produced via water electrolysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations