2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-019-00473-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Photochemical Emission of CO2 From Leaf Litter: Sources and Significance to C Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have emphasized the important acceleration effects of UV radiation on litter decomposition in drylands (Austin & Vivanco, 2006; Day & Bliss, 2020; King et al, 2012). Here, we show evidence that the magnitude of the UV effect on litter decomposition in a humid forest system was not weaker than that in drylands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have emphasized the important acceleration effects of UV radiation on litter decomposition in drylands (Austin & Vivanco, 2006; Day & Bliss, 2020; King et al, 2012). Here, we show evidence that the magnitude of the UV effect on litter decomposition in a humid forest system was not weaker than that in drylands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5). This result is consistent with findings from arid and semi‐arid ecosystems that identify photodegradation as the main driver of C turnover (Austin & Vivanco, 2006; King et al ., 2012; Austin et al ., 2016; Liu et al ., 2018; Day & Bliss, 2019; Berenstecher et al ., 2020). However, the magnitude of the effects in our study tended to be greater than findings from those environments: for instance the 60% increase in decomposition due to sunlight in semi‐arid Patagonian steppe (Austin & Vivanco, 2006), or the 23% increase across biomes (King et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2), this difference might make a minor contribution to difference in litter decay rates between sites of contrasting canopy openness. Low temperature by itself (< 25°C) leads to minor thermal degradation (van Asperen et al ., 2015), resulting in relatively low photochemical emission even in conjunction with high solar irradiance (Day & Bliss, 2019); whereas microbial activity induced by relatively high temperature may be counterbalanced by photoinhibition in the gap as discussed earlier. The biotic effect found in the gap, where mass loss was high in the dark treatments, was probably caused by relatively high microbial decomposition or decomposer herbivory (Figs 3, S6, S7), because micro‐ and meso‐fauna prefer darker environments (Lin et al ., 2018; Pieristè et al ., 2019, 2020a,b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CO 2 which is released to the atmosphere). This process is referred to as photochemical mineralisation or photomineralisation [ 384 , 385 ] (Fig. 3 A, right panel).…”
Section: Effects On Biogeochemical Cycles and Climate Feedbacksmentioning
confidence: 99%