2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar irradiation estimations and comparisons by ANFIS, Angström–Prescott and dependency models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Mohanty et al (2015) carried out a comparative study among three soft computing methodologies including ANFIS, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and radial basis function (RBF) for prediction of monthly mean global solar radiation in three locations of India. Güçlü et al (2014) performed an investigation to apply the ANFIS model, Angstr m-Prescott model, and some proposed models named dependency models for estimating global solar radiation in Turkey using sunshine duration as input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohanty et al (2015) carried out a comparative study among three soft computing methodologies including ANFIS, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and radial basis function (RBF) for prediction of monthly mean global solar radiation in three locations of India. Güçlü et al (2014) performed an investigation to apply the ANFIS model, Angstr m-Prescott model, and some proposed models named dependency models for estimating global solar radiation in Turkey using sunshine duration as input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8-12 and Table 6. Based on the research methods of Gü çlü et al (2014), comparison between calculation value of models and measured value shows that, on the whole, the fitted value of the DGSRD model 2 and DGSRD model 4 are the most close to measured value, and the accuracy is relatively high, followed by DGSRD model 3. The deviation between the fitted values of the DGSRD model 1 and CPRG model and measured values of the two models are relatively large, its accuracy is relatively low.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first step for the HarLin model is to get arithmetic average for each day. The last row in this table includes 365 daily [12]. Table 1 Calculation of daily averages.…”
Section: Harlin Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%