2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-015-2279-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar flare induced ionospheric D-region perturbation as observed at a low latitude station Agra, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
10
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that VLF phase and reflection height changes do not have a linear proportion to the logarithm of the solar X-ray flux, in agreement with some studies [e.g., Selvakumaran et al, 2015], in contradiction to others [e.g., Pacini and Raulin, 2006;Pandey et al, 2015]. By using the LWPC model they determined that such a strong flare can be explained by 13 km and 0.13 km -1 reflection height and electron density slope changes, respectively.…”
Section: Space Weather Phenomena and Eclipsessupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They found that VLF phase and reflection height changes do not have a linear proportion to the logarithm of the solar X-ray flux, in agreement with some studies [e.g., Selvakumaran et al, 2015], in contradiction to others [e.g., Pacini and Raulin, 2006;Pandey et al, 2015]. By using the LWPC model they determined that such a strong flare can be explained by 13 km and 0.13 km -1 reflection height and electron density slope changes, respectively.…”
Section: Space Weather Phenomena and Eclipsessupporting
confidence: 70%
“…That flare's magnitude was approximated to be X45 [Thomson et al, 2004], based on the conclusions of McRae and . Other studies have also examined the reflection height, electron density slope, and vertical profile modifications, due to various classes of solar flares, and obtained different parameter values, possibly due to different latitude range and lengths of the TRGCPs [e.g., Kaufmann and Mendes, 1968;Kamada, 1985;Žigman et al, 2007;Grubor et al, 2008;Schmitter, 2013;Grubor, 2014, 2015;Pandey et al, 2015;Šulić et al, 2016]. These calculated values had a large variance, and a few of them [e.g., Kamada, 1985;Grubor et al, 2008] reached magnitudes which were comparable to those deduced by Thomson et al [2005].…”
Section: Space Weather Phenomena and Eclipsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 13 gives the simple dependence for H' with the well-defined slope Looking at the Figure 13, one can see a totally different situation for the results of It can be noticed that, when the intense solar flux increases during SF, values of the reflection height H' decrease. Looking at Figure 12, generally speaking, there is a good agreement in the values of the reflection height from the literature [41][42][43][44]. When the intensity of radiation increases from 10 −6 to 10 −3 Wm −2 (i.e., when we go from normal conditions of the ionosphere to the perturbed ionosphere due to strong X-class SF), the reflections go down from 74 km to 50 km.…”
Section: Comparison Of Obtained Ionospheric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The sharpness parameter β and reflection height H' (red squares) calculated in present work are plotted in Figures 12 and 13 together with results of other authors [41][42][43][44]. In Table S3, one can find the data of amplitude and phase perturbations of the VLF signal and the ionospheric parameters induced by different SF events which were also analyzed in this study.…”
Section: Comparison Of Obtained Ionospheric Parameterssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In Figure 14, we present the results from this investigation, i.e., paper (using three methods from Sections 2.2.1-2.2.3), which are either simulated, calculated, approximated or the data obtained from literature [16,37,[40][41][42], for electron density N e at reference height as a function of X-ray flux. The area of importance is between the two red lines.…”
Section: Comparison Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%