2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9e53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Flare Forecast Using 3D Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: Solar flares are immense energy explosions in the solar atmosphere and severely influence space weather. So, forecasting solar flare eruptions is extremely important. Spatial distribution and evolution of active region (AR) magnetic fields are closely related to flare eruptions. In this paper, we simultaneously utilized the two characteristics to build two flare-forecast models using three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (3D CNNs). The two models forecast whether an AR would erupt a ≥C- or ≥M-class f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of Table 13 corroborate our hypothesis that resampling the test set is capable of biasing towards better results and the discussion of comparing works with such different RPSs. Table 13 shows how the results of SF MViT oT are discrepant and how the results of "SF MViT oTV Test" are closer to those of Li et al (2020); Deng et al (2021); Sun et al (2022).…”
Section: Literature Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of Table 13 corroborate our hypothesis that resampling the test set is capable of biasing towards better results and the discussion of comparing works with such different RPSs. Table 13 shows how the results of SF MViT oT are discrepant and how the results of "SF MViT oTV Test" are closer to those of Li et al (2020); Deng et al (2021); Sun et al (2022).…”
Section: Literature Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We Despite not using oversampling, Sun et al (2022) built their dataset considering only some ARs without flares, resulting in a positive sample rate of 13.29% in the test set from 2010 to 2019 for ≥M-class flares. According to Guastavino et al (2022), the RPS for ≥M-class flares in the HMI archive for the time interval from 2012 September to 2017 September is around 3.20%, considering the 24 h forecast window scenario.…”
Section: Literature Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the availability of large amounts of flare-related data 14 , researchers started using machine learning methods for flare forecasting 3 , 19 , 20 . More recently, deep learning, which is a subfield of machine learning, has emerged and showed promising results in predicting solar eruptions, including solar flares 21 , 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Nishizuka et al 23 developed deep neural networks to forecast M- and C-class flares that would occur within 24 h using data downloaded from the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) 24 and the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES). Sun et al 22 employed three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to forecast M-class and C-class flares using Space-weather HMI Active Region Patches (SHARP) 25 magnetograms downloaded from the Joint Science Operations Center (JSOC) accessible at http://jsoc.stanford.edu/ . Li et al 26 also adopted a CNN model to forecast M-class and C-class flares using SHARP magnetograms where the authors restructured the CNN layers in their neural network with different filter sizes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%