2015
DOI: 10.7275/r5n58jkf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Energy Resource Assessment Using R.SUN In GRASS GIS And Site Suitability Analysis Using AHP For Groundmounted Solar Photovoltaic (PV) Farm In The Central Luzon Region (Region 3), Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis, performed with ArcGIS, uses solar radiation maps and technical regional maps for geographical data. Another study by Pintor et al (2015), analyzed the available daily solar irradiation using r.sun tool in GIS and identified possible sites for ground mounted PV farms. It uses typical days per month to reduce simulation runs from 365 to 12 using the days suggested by Duffie and Beckman, 1991.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis, performed with ArcGIS, uses solar radiation maps and technical regional maps for geographical data. Another study by Pintor et al (2015), analyzed the available daily solar irradiation using r.sun tool in GIS and identified possible sites for ground mounted PV farms. It uses typical days per month to reduce simulation runs from 365 to 12 using the days suggested by Duffie and Beckman, 1991.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, ArcGIS [99] provides a solar radiation toolbox [100], which operates similarly to r.sun and has undergone calibration and validation through international research endeavors [101]. The advantage of r.sun is the number of users it has already reached, and so, the number of calibrations and validations this tool has undergone [102]. Therefore, for solar potential assessment, r.sun was selected, applying the methodology described in the work of Gasparovic et al [103].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%