2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-014-0499-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Energetic Particles and Associated EIT Disturbances in Solar Cycle 23

Abstract: We explore the link between solar energetic particles (SEPs) observed at 1 AU and large-scale disturbances propagating in the solar corona, named after the Extreme ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT) as EIT waves, which trace the lateral expansion of a coronal mass ejection (CME). A comprehensive search for SOHO/EIT waves was carried out for 179 SEP events during Solar Cycle 23 (1997 -2006). 87 % of the SEP events were found to be accompanied by EIT waves. In order to test if the EIT waves play a role in the S… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(69 reference statements)
3
46
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For those events which had an associated type II radio burst, the start of the radio emission was observed after the start of the wave in the vast majority of cases (see Figure 6a), similar to the relative start times of waves and radio bursts reported by Miteva et al (2014) and Warmuth (2010). This delay between the start time of the global wave and the associated type II burst is likely due to the time taken for the disturbance to either become superAlfvénic (as modelled by Vršnak and Lulić, 2000), or the time taken for the driver to reach regions of low ambient Alfvén speed in the corona (Mann et al, 2003;Zucca et al, 2014); in some cases this can take up to 30 minutes after detection of the wave.…”
Section: Relationship With Type II Radio Burstssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For those events which had an associated type II radio burst, the start of the radio emission was observed after the start of the wave in the vast majority of cases (see Figure 6a), similar to the relative start times of waves and radio bursts reported by Miteva et al (2014) and Warmuth (2010). This delay between the start time of the global wave and the associated type II burst is likely due to the time taken for the disturbance to either become superAlfvénic (as modelled by Vršnak and Lulić, 2000), or the time taken for the driver to reach regions of low ambient Alfvén speed in the corona (Mann et al, 2003;Zucca et al, 2014); in some cases this can take up to 30 minutes after detection of the wave.…”
Section: Relationship With Type II Radio Burstssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A window 90 minutes either side of the start time of the global wave was used to look for associated events in the NOAA/SWPC list. This choice of time window was motivated by the fact that type II radio bursts can be seen up to 15 minutes before or after the first instance of an EUV wave observation (Park et al, 2013;Warmuth, 2010;Miteva et al, 2014); the larger time window used here was chosen to account for any anomalous events. For each candidate radio burst associated with a global wave, the SWPC list provides an associated start time, an end time, the observatory used to make the observation, the frequency range of the burst and the estimated drift speed.…”
Section: Identification and Characterisation Of Type II Radio Burstsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The largest statistical study of wave-associated SEPs was undertaken by Miteva et al (2014), who analyzed 179 SEP events and found that 87% of them were accompanied by EIT waves. In events with no apparent magnetic connection to Earth, the waves' arrival time at the footpoint of the Parker spiral showed a significant correlation with the extrapolated injection times of IP protons.…”
Section: Acceleration Of Solar Energetic Particles (Seps)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.2. The 2005 Jan. 20 event was clearly eruptive, with a fast CME (Grechnev et al 2008) and an EUV wave (Miteva et al 2014). These phenomena were very likely accompanied by shock waves and therefore Type II radio bursts.…”
Section: Relativistic Proton Release and Electromagnetic Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%