2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016ja022522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar cycle response and long‐term trends in the mesospheric metal layers

Abstract: The meteoric metal layers (Na, Fe, and K)—which form as a result of the ablation of incoming meteors—act as unique tracers for chemical and dynamical processes that occur within the upper mesosphere/lower thermosphere region. In this work, we examine whether these metal layers are sensitive indicators of decadal long‐term changes within the upper atmosphere. Output from a whole‐atmosphere climate model is used to assess the response of the Na, K, and Fe layers across a 50 year period (1955–2005). At short time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(82 reference statements)
3
30
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, an investigation of Dawkins et al () of the global long‐term variations of the K column density N K with free running WACCM for the period from 1955 to 2005 resulted in a solar cycle effect of −14.4 ± 1.3% per 100 sfu and a long‐term trend of +3.1 ± 0.5% per decade for the latitude interval between the equator and 30°S. Moreover, the same study shows a much less negative solar forcing for the Na column density, which agrees with the differences between the Na and K nightglow intensities discussed in section .…”
Section: K Nightglow Simulation With the Waccm‐k Modelsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, an investigation of Dawkins et al () of the global long‐term variations of the K column density N K with free running WACCM for the period from 1955 to 2005 resulted in a solar cycle effect of −14.4 ± 1.3% per 100 sfu and a long‐term trend of +3.1 ± 0.5% per decade for the latitude interval between the equator and 30°S. Moreover, the same study shows a much less negative solar forcing for the Na column density, which agrees with the differences between the Na and K nightglow intensities discussed in section .…”
Section: K Nightglow Simulation With the Waccm‐k Modelsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Interestingly, an investigation of Dawkins et al (2016) of the global long-term variations of the K column density N K with free running WACCM for the period from 1955 to 2005 resulted in a solar cycle effect of −14.4 ± 1.3% per 100 sfu and a long-term trend of +3.1 ± 0.5% per decade for the latitude interval between the equator and 30 • S. Moreover, the same study shows a much less negative solar forcing for the Na column density, which agrees with the differences between the Na and K nightglow intensities discussed in section 3.2. Hence, the presence of a negative solar cycle effect for K nightglow appears to be related to variations in the metal atom abundance, which is dominated by changes in the equilibrium between the metal atom and its reservoir species, that is, molecules and ions.…”
Section: Long-term Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Above 100 km, the significant anticorrelation of the metal layers with SSI is explained by the role of ion‐molecule chemistry (Plane et al, ). (3) At the metal layer peaks, only K shows a small anticorrelation within error, which is consistent with the response of the K layer to the 11‐year solar cycle (Dawkins et al, ). The only available observational data of the Na layer made by the spaceborne OSIRIS instrument also shows a weak anticorrelation to the 27‐day solar rotational cycle during 2004–2013, which is consistent with the WACCM analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Recently, Dawkins et al . [] explore the long‐term trends in the K layer due to climate change and solar variability. The K layer is predicted to be much more sensitive to both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semiannual oscillation of the K centroid height reported here is in contrast to the lack of strong oscillations reported by Friedman et al [2002] and Zhou et al [2005] for solar maximum conditions. Recently, Dawkins et al [2016] explore the long-term trends in the K layer due to climate change and solar variability. The K layer is predicted to be much more sensitive to both.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%