2005
DOI: 10.1029/2005ja011137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar cycle–dependent helicity transport by magnetic clouds

Abstract: [1] Magnetic clouds observed with the Wind and ACE spacecraft are fit with the static, linear force-free cylinder model to obtain estimates of the chirality, fluxes, and magnetic helicity of each event. The fastest magnetic clouds (MCs) are shown to carry the most flux and helicity. We calculate the net cumulative helicity which measures the difference in right-and left-handed helicity contained in MCs over time. The net cumulative helicity does not average to zero; rather, a strong left-handed helicity bias d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
158
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
15
158
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding their origin and propagation is therefore key, not only for the Earth but also for understanding how the Sun loses both magnetic flux and magnetic helicity (Low 1996;Lynch et al 2005). Over the years, a wide variety of models have been put forward to explain the origin of CMEs, and a discussion of these can be seen in the reviews of Forbes et al (2006) and Chen (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding their origin and propagation is therefore key, not only for the Earth but also for understanding how the Sun loses both magnetic flux and magnetic helicity (Low 1996;Lynch et al 2005). Over the years, a wide variety of models have been put forward to explain the origin of CMEs, and a discussion of these can be seen in the reviews of Forbes et al (2006) and Chen (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field in MCs can be relatively well modeled by the so-called Lundquist model (Lundquist 1950), which considers a static and axially-symmetric linear force-free magnetic configuration (e.g., Burlaga 1988;Lepping et al 1990;Lynch et al 2003). Alternately, Farrugia et al (1999) considered a cylindrical shape for the cloud cross-section and a non-linear force-free field, while Mulligan et al (1999), Hidalgo et al (2002), and Cid et al (2002) have considered a cylindrical cloud with a finite plasma pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest solution is obtained with a cylindrical boundary; this is the so-called Lundquist model (Lundquist 1950). It was, and is still, widely used to fit the magnetic field observed in MCs and to derive global quantities such as the magnetic flux and helicity (e.g., Burlaga 1988;Lepping et al 1990;Dasso et al 2003;Lynch et al 2003;Dasso et al 2005b;Mandrini et al 2005;Dasso et al 2006;Leitner et al 2007). An extension of this model to an elliptical boundary was realized by Vandas & Romashets (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%