2014
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/794/1/l2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar Cycle 24: Curious Changes in the Relative Numbers of Sunspot Group Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found that the number of large groups peaked about two years later than small ones except for solar cycle 22 (1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996): the difference between large and small SG numbers is very prominent during solar cycle 23, while maxima were almost flat during solar cycle 21 and 22. Recently, Kilcik et al (2014) analyzed the sunspot counts (SSCs) in four categories, as small, medium, large and final, from 1982 to 2014, and found similar results for SSCs. Here, we analyzed monthly median f 0 F 1 and f 0 F 2 for 1976 -2015 time interval which include this anomalous solar cycle 23 (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008) and which clearly reveals that during solar cycle 23 the f 0 F 1 is following the temporal variation of SSGN, while the f 0 F 2 is following the LSGN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They found that the number of large groups peaked about two years later than small ones except for solar cycle 22 (1986)(1987)(1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994)(1995)(1996): the difference between large and small SG numbers is very prominent during solar cycle 23, while maxima were almost flat during solar cycle 21 and 22. Recently, Kilcik et al (2014) analyzed the sunspot counts (SSCs) in four categories, as small, medium, large and final, from 1982 to 2014, and found similar results for SSCs. Here, we analyzed monthly median f 0 F 1 and f 0 F 2 for 1976 -2015 time interval which include this anomalous solar cycle 23 (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008) and which clearly reveals that during solar cycle 23 the f 0 F 1 is following the temporal variation of SSGN, while the f 0 F 2 is following the LSGN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In the minimum between cycles 23 and 24 the contribution of sunspot in small groups to the total number of sunspots was a factor of 7 to 8 higher than that of sunspots in large groups. Kilcik et al (2011Kilcik et al ( , 2014, based on data from Learmonth Observatory, showed that different types of sunspots and groups of sunspots behave differently over a solar cycle, and their relative abundance varies from cycle to cycle. Here we confirm and expand this result for two more observatories: Holloman and San Vito.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data for the four most recent solar cycles, Kilcik et al (2014) separated active regions into four types, based on the size of the sunspot group and the sunspot evolution:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sunspots, which happen in photosphere, is the basic signal of solar activity. Relative number of sunspots is the most common and fundamental parameter which depicts the intensity of solar activity [15]. According to the definition given by R. Wolf in 1848, relative number of sunspots, which is also known as the Zurich number, is determined by the equation given below:…”
Section: Analysis On the Joint Effects Of Solar Activity And Atmosphementioning
confidence: 99%