2018
DOI: 10.1002/pip.3102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Solar cell efficiency tables (Version 53)

Abstract: Consolidated tables showing an extensive listing of the highest independently confirmed efficiencies for solar cells and modules are presented. Guidelines for inclusion of results into these tables are outlined and new entries since July 2018 are reviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

8
510
1
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 704 publications
(526 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(12 reference statements)
8
510
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in the defect characteristics of Cu 2 The similar atomic number (and hence the similar atomic form factor [27] ) of Cu and Zn makes these elements difficult to differentiate using the conventional Cu-K α radiation, and hence, X-ray diffraction (XRD; Figure 1a, solid blue line) cannot be used to confirm whether Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 thin films adopt a kesterite or a stannite structure. [28] Figure 1b (solid blue line) illustrates this by comparing the XRD pattern for Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 (0.86) with the simulated XRD patterns for Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 with a kesterite, disordered kesterite (complete disorder on 2c and 2d sites), and stannite structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The differences in the defect characteristics of Cu 2 The similar atomic number (and hence the similar atomic form factor [27] ) of Cu and Zn makes these elements difficult to differentiate using the conventional Cu-K α radiation, and hence, X-ray diffraction (XRD; Figure 1a, solid blue line) cannot be used to confirm whether Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 thin films adopt a kesterite or a stannite structure. [28] Figure 1b (solid blue line) illustrates this by comparing the XRD pattern for Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 (0.86) with the simulated XRD patterns for Cu 2 ZnSnS 4 with a kesterite, disordered kesterite (complete disorder on 2c and 2d sites), and stannite structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2] However, kesterite-based solar cells, such as Cu 2 ZnSn(S,Se) 4 , which share many of the same characteristics of CIGS and CdTe, significantly lag behind, with a record power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 12.6%. [1] These solar-cell technologies are already commercialized, with lab-scale photovoltaic efficiencies exceeding 22%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs has sharply increased from the initial 3.8% in 2009 to over 24% in 2019, [1][2][3] achieving comparable photovoltaic performance compared to commercial silicon-based solar cells. A power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSCs has sharply increased from the initial 3.8% in 2009 to over 24% in 2019, [1][2][3] achieving comparable photovoltaic performance compared to commercial silicon-based solar cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ar esult of the enhanced purity of the reagents [1,2] and careful optimization of the perovskite layer fabrication process, conversion efficiencies have increased significantly since the first report on perovskite solar cells in 2009. [27,28] Forl arge-area devices,h owever, the certified PCE of as ubmodule still remains under 12 %. [27,28] Forl arge-area devices,h owever, the certified PCE of as ubmodule still remains under 12 %.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26] Thehighest certified power-conversion efficiency(PCE) now exceeds 23 %. [28] Further optimization of perovskite layer fabrication methods is therefore needed to obtain more efficient devices with larger active areas. [28] Further optimization of perovskite layer fabrication methods is therefore needed to obtain more efficient devices with larger active areas.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%