1963
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1255645099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sojourn times of diffusion processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
4

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
81
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ciesielski-Taylor identities in law, which we shall study in this Chapter, were published in 1962, that is one year before the publication of the papers of Ray and Knight (1963; [80] and [57]) on Brownian local times; as we shall see below, this is more than a mere coincidence!…”
Section: An Explanation and Some Extensions Of The Ciesielski-taylor mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Ciesielski-Taylor identities in law, which we shall study in this Chapter, were published in 1962, that is one year before the publication of the papers of Ray and Knight (1963; [80] and [57]) on Brownian local times; as we shall see below, this is more than a mere coincidence!…”
Section: An Explanation and Some Extensions Of The Ciesielski-taylor mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is no easy formulation of a Ray-Knight theorem for Brownian local times taken at a fixed time t (see Perkins [68] and Jeulin [52], who have independently obtained a semimartingale decomposition of the local times in the space variable); the situation is much easier when the fixed time is replaced by an independent exponential time, as is explained briefly in paragraph 3.4, following Biane-Yor [19]; the original result is due to Ray [80], but it is presented in a very different form than Theorem 3.5 in the present chapter.…”
Section: Comments On Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case α = 2, Theorem B takes the form of the additivity property of squared Bessel processes, which is an equivalent form of the usual Ray-Knight theorem for Brownian local time at τ (1); see Ray [15], Knight [10]. In the case α = 2, Theorem B takes the form of the additivity property of squared Bessel processes, which is an equivalent form of the usual Ray-Knight theorem for Brownian local time at τ (1); see Ray [15], Knight [10].…”
Section: Ray-knight Theorem For Stable Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before going over to the proofs of Theorems 3.1-3.8, we adduce the results of Ray and Knight [11], [12] characterizing t(t, y) as a process with respect to y. These results are used to prove Theorems 3.1-3.8 and will be formulated as befits our objective.…”
Section: Theorem 33 Let F(y T) ((Y T) [A B] X [0 )) Be a Continmentioning
confidence: 99%