First International Conference on the Quantitative Evaluation of Systems, 2004. QEST 2004. Proceedings. 2004
DOI: 10.1109/qest.2004.1348023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sojourn time distributions in modulated G-queues with batch processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The queue length and the sojourn time analysis of the basic variant of this queue have been published in [Chakka and Harrison(2001)] and [Harrison and Zatschler(2004)], respectively. If c = 1 (single server) and there are no negative customers the system belongs to the model class presented in this paper.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The queue length and the sojourn time analysis of the basic variant of this queue have been published in [Chakka and Harrison(2001)] and [Harrison and Zatschler(2004)], respectively. If c = 1 (single server) and there are no negative customers the system belongs to the model class presented in this paper.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we compare the latency of our fast model solving technique, whose implementation still relies on Mathematica, with the latency for obtaining the queue statistics via either simulative analysis or by applying the most efficient exact solution technique (to the best of our knowledge) presented in [9], for which we have developed an implementation using again the Mathematica library. Actually, the main computational steps required by this exact solution are the following:…”
Section: The Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By these data we get that our fast model solving procedure always shows execution time lower than (or at most up to) 11 milliseconds, while the simulative solution shows latency from 5 to 10 seconds. Concerning the exact method in [9], it shows execution time on the order of 100 milliseconds only for the MMPP with 2 states. On the other hand, its performance rapidly decreases when the number of states in the MMPP arrival process gets increased.…”
Section: The Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the discussions and deductions in Section 3, we have conducted the analysis while varying the parameters µ, ρ i and α i,j , as well as the number of states composing the MMPP arrival process. Also, the approximation error is evaluated by comparing the output statistics of the approximate model with those obtained by the implementation of the exact solution technique in [14]. …”
Section: Evaluation Of the Approximation Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to several other works addressing exact solution techniques for the M M P P/M/1 queue (based either on matrix geometric methods [2,24], or on generating functions [12], or on spectral expansion [6,13], or even on a combination of these approaches [14,34]), some of the approximations in [5] do not require iterative or numerical methods, e.g., for the determination of matrix eigenvalues/eigenvectors. Hence they can provide benefits for the latency of the analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%