2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2018.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil weathering analysis using a portable X-ray fluorescence (PXRF) spectrometer in an Inceptisol from the Brazilian Cerrado

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mancini et al (2019) found SiO 2 contents for Typic Dystrustepts and Typic Ustorthents ranging from 40 to 50% for hematitic phyllite and 40 and 45% for goethitic phyllite. Silva et al (2018a) identified variation from 5.7 to 19.9% for SiO 2 concentrations in an Inceptisol profile developed from phyllite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mancini et al (2019) found SiO 2 contents for Typic Dystrustepts and Typic Ustorthents ranging from 40 to 50% for hematitic phyllite and 40 and 45% for goethitic phyllite. Silva et al (2018a) identified variation from 5.7 to 19.9% for SiO 2 concentrations in an Inceptisol profile developed from phyllite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low Fe contents are a reflection of the low content of ferromagnesian minerals in the quartzite such as pyroxene, amphibole, and biotite (Araujo et al, 2014). Silva et al (2018a) identified variation from 2.5 to 7.4% for Fe concentrations in an Inceptisol profile developed from phyllite. Higher SiO 2 contents and lower Fe contents reflect the difference between the mineralogy of quartzite and phyllite.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers are increasingly using hand‐held portable X‐ray fluorescence (pXRF) instruments in the field and laboratory (Chakraborty et al., ; Stockmann, Cattle, Minasny, & McBratney, ), with soils and Quaternary sediments being common targets for such analyses (e.g., Jacobs & Davis, ; Mancini, Weindorf, & Chakraborty, ; Silva et al., ). Numerous studies have demonstrated that pXRF measurements correlate well with data obtained using conventional methods, such as bench‐top XRF (Hunt & Speakman, ), or from various acid digestion (Schneider et al., ) or wet chemistry techniques (Sarala, ), followed by analysis of the extracts using inductively coupled plasma spectrometry (Booth et al., ; Lubos, Dreibrodt, & Bahr, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For soil investigations, some studies have obtained data by placing the instrument directly onto a field‐moist core or profile face (e.g., Ribeiro, Silva, Silva, & Guilherma, ; Stockmann et al., ; Silva et al., 2018). Samples returned to the laboratory are also sometimes scanned while they are field moist, although at this point most researchers dry, disaggregate, and/or sieve the samples before treatment or measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%