2006
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Water Regime in Space and Time in a Small Georgia Piedmont Catchment under Pasture

Abstract: Soil water influences hydrological, biological, and biogeochemical processes that determine on-and off-site response of landscapes under different agricultural uses. There are relatively little detailed spatial and temporal soil water measurements to validate current representations of spatial and temporal soil water variability. Soil water was measured over 3 yr at 12 sites to a 1.2-m depth in a 7.8-ha pasture catchment in the Georgia Piedmont in southeastern USA. The Mahalanobis statistical difference was es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the measurements were conducted for the upper horizons that originated mostly from loess. The upper horizons probably conduct most of the water through the soil and across the slope, as found by other researchers (Endale et al, 2006; Needelman et al, 2004). The fact that soil depth seemed to be a major and consistent driver of measured K sat differences (compared with measurement methods and slope position) within small catchments, and when combined with similarities in mean measured K sat between land uses and soils and with the representativeness of forest or pasture land uses and soils to larger watersheds, allowed the K sat upscaling from the small catchment to the larger watershed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Most of the measurements were conducted for the upper horizons that originated mostly from loess. The upper horizons probably conduct most of the water through the soil and across the slope, as found by other researchers (Endale et al, 2006; Needelman et al, 2004). The fact that soil depth seemed to be a major and consistent driver of measured K sat differences (compared with measurement methods and slope position) within small catchments, and when combined with similarities in mean measured K sat between land uses and soils and with the representativeness of forest or pasture land uses and soils to larger watersheds, allowed the K sat upscaling from the small catchment to the larger watershed.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Th e soils generally have brownish-gray sandy loam to red clay loam surface horizons overlaying red clayey argillic horizons. In W1, the Bt horizon begins less than 35 cm from the surface in the Pacolet but is 35 to 65 cm or deeper from the surface in the Cecil (Endale et al, 2006a). Soil samples taken from the 0-to 15-cm depth from 14 locations in W1 in December 2009 had a pH-water range of 5.6 to 6.5 (mean, 6.1).…”
Section: Experimental Site Soil Weather and Land Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggestion to use the hydrogeophysical surveys for initial zonation needs to be further tested. Differences in soil horizon thickness, topography, shallow ground water, can cause dissimilarity in time series of soil water contents at different locations [150]. Several studies indicate that temporal stability of soil water patterns may be affected by the type of soil water sensor used.…”
Section: Indirect Measurements and Data Fusion To Reveal Soil Structumentioning
confidence: 99%