Unsaturated Soils 2006 2006
DOI: 10.1061/40802(189)140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil-Water Characteristic Curves (SWCC) for Lime Treated Expansive Soil from Mosul City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the analysis of the SWCC, it can be concluded that the addition of the RHA will make the pore size distribution of stabilized soil more uniform and compact, and increases the water retention capacity. These results are similar to those of the earlier studies on lime-stabilized soil [29,30,31]. The main reason for this phenomenon may be that the flocculation and pozzolanic reaction between RHA and lime can help change the microstructure and interface properties of soil, thus make the pore size distribution more uniform and enhancing the water retention performance of stabilized soil [29].…”
Section: Analysis Of Soil–water Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Through the analysis of the SWCC, it can be concluded that the addition of the RHA will make the pore size distribution of stabilized soil more uniform and compact, and increases the water retention capacity. These results are similar to those of the earlier studies on lime-stabilized soil [29,30,31]. The main reason for this phenomenon may be that the flocculation and pozzolanic reaction between RHA and lime can help change the microstructure and interface properties of soil, thus make the pore size distribution more uniform and enhancing the water retention performance of stabilized soil [29].…”
Section: Analysis Of Soil–water Characteristicssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Russo (2005) and Tedesco (2006) determined the water retention curve of a lime-treated silt using a pressure plate apparatus and observed that the water retention capacity increased significantly with curing time. Khattab & Al-Taie (2006) also observed an increasing water retention capacity of a lime-treated soil with the increase in clay fraction, lime content and curing time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The latter paper focused on the effect of curing time (7-vs. 28-day curing) on the SWRC and linked the SWRC changes to mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) studies. In addition, Khattab and AlTaie [20] studied the SWRC of three lime-stabilised expansive soils from Mosul City, Iraq, upon single drying paths in the suction range of 0-1000 kPa, using the osmotic method. All three papers recognised that the lime-treated soil compacted dry of optimum had a reduced water retention (compared with soils compacted wet of optimum) due to the larger voids developed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%