2009
DOI: 10.2172/992383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Water Balance and Recharge Monitoring at the Hanford Site - FY09 Status Report

Abstract: Recharge provides the primary driving force for transporting contaminants from the vadose zone to underlying aquifer systems. Quantification of recharge rates is important for assessing contaminant transport and fate and for evaluating remediation alternatives. This report describes the status of soil water balance and recharge monitoring performed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WFM data for this site are not reported. As noted by Rockhold et al (2009), the WFMs at this site have not been operating as expected. In addition, the coarse gravel surfaces and lack of vegetation are not representative of conditions above the SWL lysimeter.…”
Section: Integrated Disposal Facility Dune Sitementioning
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The WFM data for this site are not reported. As noted by Rockhold et al (2009), the WFMs at this site have not been operating as expected. In addition, the coarse gravel surfaces and lack of vegetation are not representative of conditions above the SWL lysimeter.…”
Section: Integrated Disposal Facility Dune Sitementioning
confidence: 51%
“…The site description material came from a variety of sources, including Rockhold et al (2009), Nichols et al (2008, and Fayer and Keller (2007).…”
Section: Recharge Sites and Monitoring Activities In Fy 2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We employed zero‐flux flow boundary conditions at the lower boundary as it is constrained by the fine‐grained Ringold Formation with a hydraulic conductivity 2 to 3 orders of magnitude lower than that of the Hanford formation. A small recharge rate (55 mm/yr) was applied at the top boundary based on monitoring results at nearby locations [ Rockhold et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodology and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed no‐flux boundary conditions for the top and bottom boundaries, as the recharge at the top was relatively small [ Rockhold et al , 2009] and the bottom of the modeling domain was constrained by the fine‐grained Ringold formation. Initial flow conditions were specified as hydrostatic head corresponding to a water table at 105 m.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%