2007
DOI: 10.1029/2006jd008048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil uptake of carbonyl sulfide in subtropical forests with different successional stages in south China

Abstract: [1] The uptake rates of carbonyl sulfide (COS) by soils in subtropical forests with different successional stages were measured using static chambers in Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve (DBR) in south China from July 2004 to March 2005. The three typical tropical forests studied included monsoon evergreen broad-leaf forest (BF), pine and broad-leaf mixed forest (MF) and pine forest (PF), representing forests with different succession stages in the region. COS exchange rates were also compared between the plots wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

12
94
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
12
94
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we were not able to partition the nighttime uptake of OCS into soil and vegetative contributions in late April. This estimate, for active soils in April and December is in close agreement with the average soil uptake measured in a creek area in Colorado (28) of 7 ± 2.6 pmol·m −2 ·s −1 and is slightly greater than the average uptake rate for soil in a mixed forest reported for China of 4.8 ± 2.9 pmol·m −2 ·s −1 (31).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, we were not able to partition the nighttime uptake of OCS into soil and vegetative contributions in late April. This estimate, for active soils in April and December is in close agreement with the average soil uptake measured in a creek area in Colorado (28) of 7 ± 2.6 pmol·m −2 ·s −1 and is slightly greater than the average uptake rate for soil in a mixed forest reported for China of 4.8 ± 2.9 pmol·m −2 ·s −1 (31).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…OVOC species were analyzed by a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry detector (GC-MSD) system (6890/5973N, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled with an Entech Preconcentrator (Entech Instruments Inc., Simi Vally, CA, USA). Details about sample analysis, standard preparation and calibration were similar to those presented previously (Yi et al, 2007;Wang and Wu, 2008). Briefly, an Entech Preconcentrator with three stages of cryo-trapping was applied to concentrate OVOCs before GC-MS analysis.…”
Section: Ovocs Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil COS uptake depends nonlinearly on soil temperature and moisture, with optimal conditions that maximize the uptake (Kesselmeier et al, 1999;Van Diest and Kesselmeier, 2008;Whelan et al, 2016). Soil COS uptake also correlates positively with soil respiration (Yi et al, 2007;Berkelhammer et al, 2014;Sun et al, 2016), suggesting a link through microbial activity between them.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerated upland soils are primarily weak COS sinks, whereas anoxic wetland soils are COS sources (Whelan et al, 2013). In unmanaged upland soils, the uptake rates range from 0 to 12 pmol m −2 s −1 in field studies (e.g., Steinbacher et al, 2004;Yi et al, 2007;Berkelhammer et al, 2014). Soil COS uptake depends nonlinearly on soil temperature and moisture, with optimal conditions that maximize the uptake (Kesselmeier et al, 1999;Van Diest and Kesselmeier, 2008;Whelan et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%