2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil temperature under forests: a simple model for predicting soil temperature under a range of forest types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
77
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Strictly, equation (3) is only applicable if mean temperatures are invariant along the soil profile. However, most models to predict daily and seasonal changes of soil temperature assume a constant mean soil temperature along the profile (Kang et al, 2000;Paul et al, 2004), irrespectively of the soil type and period of the year, to be able to use the equation. The fitted regressions were significant (*p < 0.05) on all single days, showing (Table 7) were significantly higher (*p < 0.05) than those for the entire profile and for P2 due to the lower temperature amplitude gradients in the Ah horizon under the litter layer.…”
Section: Thermal Wave Damping With Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strictly, equation (3) is only applicable if mean temperatures are invariant along the soil profile. However, most models to predict daily and seasonal changes of soil temperature assume a constant mean soil temperature along the profile (Kang et al, 2000;Paul et al, 2004), irrespectively of the soil type and period of the year, to be able to use the equation. The fitted regressions were significant (*p < 0.05) on all single days, showing (Table 7) were significantly higher (*p < 0.05) than those for the entire profile and for P2 due to the lower temperature amplitude gradients in the Ah horizon under the litter layer.…”
Section: Thermal Wave Damping With Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional shelter provided by the litter layer may reduce further convective and radiative heat exchange between soil and atmosphere, but this effect may depend on both the degree of canopy cover and thickness of the layer (Johnson-Maynard et al, 2004). Kang et al (2000) predicted deciduous forest soil temperatures from air temperature data in vast areas and latitudes, and assigned a value to the litter layer similar to that of the leaf area index, while Paul et al (2004) used the litter layer mass to predict average soil temperatures from air temperature of several forest types in Australia. The daily variation of soil temperature would be reduced under increased shelter, controlling the penetration depth of the daily heat wave into the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil water and temperature at a particular depth and date are predicted through simple sub-models of soil temperature (Paul et al, 2004) and soil water (Paul et al, 2003b), which had been calibrated across many different soil types, depths and textural classes.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sinusoidal soil temperature models that assume periodic temperature fluctuations and are parameterized with simple meteorological measurements are particularly attractive due to their ease of calculation and minimal data requirements (Paul et al, 2004;Droulia et al, 2009). However, such models can provide unsatisfactory results because they assume soil homogeneity and ignore the spatiotemporal temperature variations caused by overstory shading (Hardy et al, 2004;Bond-Lamberty et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most models for estimating soil temperature are based on simplified, bare-soil, or agricultural conditions (e.g., Gonzalez-Dugo et al, 2009;Saito and Simunek, 2009), although there are numerous efforts that include the influence of natural vegetation (e.g., Paul et al, 2004;Bond-Lamberty et al, 2005). Models for soil temperature and heat flux also vary in complexity from estimations of soil temperature based on readily available meteorological measurements * Corresponding author.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%