1966
DOI: 10.2172/6152345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil survey: Hanford project in Benton County, Washington

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The land use data were used to help create GIS layers on existing land use. Soils data were entered into the GIS using digital copies of the existing Hanford soil survey (Hajek 1966) and USDA Soil Surveys for Grant (1984) and Franklin Counties (draft inflorrnation 1999). Parts of Adams and Benton Coun@ soil surveys (1967 and 1971, respectively) were digitized and entered into the GIS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The land use data were used to help create GIS layers on existing land use. Soils data were entered into the GIS using digital copies of the existing Hanford soil survey (Hajek 1966) and USDA Soil Surveys for Grant (1984) and Franklin Counties (draft inflorrnation 1999). Parts of Adams and Benton Coun@ soil surveys (1967 and 1971, respectively) were digitized and entered into the GIS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soils " Hajek (1966) described 15 different general surface soil types on the Hanford Site, ranging from sand to silty and sandy loams. These same soils are found elsewhere in Benton, Grant, Adams, and Franklin counties, and most are being irrigated.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are shown in Figure 4.2-7 and briefly described in Table 4.2-1. Various classifications, including land use, are also given in Hajek (1966). The soil classifications given in Hajek (1966) have not been updated to reflect current reinterpretations of soil classifications.…”
Section: Soikmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil classifications given in Hajek (1966) have not been updated to reflect current reinterpretations of soil classifications. Until soils on the Hanfiord Site are resurveyed, the descriptions presented in Hajek (1966) will continue to be used.…”
Section: Soikmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the relative flat nature of the surface, landslides are not expected to be significant. Hajek (1966) Rupert Sand: brown-to-grayish brown coarse sand grading to dark grayish-brown at about 90 centimeters (35 inches). Developed under grass, sagebrush, and hopsage in coarse sandy alluvial deposits that were mantled by wind-blown sand.…”
Section: 273mentioning
confidence: 99%