2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40098-016-0200-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Suction Measurement of Unsaturated Soils with a Sensor Using Fixed-Matrix Porous Ceramic Discs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Briaud et al. (2003), expansive clays are generally subjected to 3000 kPa of high suction values at surface levels due to desiccation (dry climates) and this fact was verified by Tripathy et al. (2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Briaud et al. (2003), expansive clays are generally subjected to 3000 kPa of high suction values at surface levels due to desiccation (dry climates) and this fact was verified by Tripathy et al. (2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Two moisture sensors (EC-5; Decagon Devices, Inc., USA) and one suction sensor (TEROS-21; Decagon Devices, Inc., USA) were installed in each potted sample. Acceptable accuracy and reliability have been validated for kaolin and bentonite (Tripathy et al., 2016). Actually, suction sensor calibration is not affected by soil type theoretically, because only water potential of the ceramic discs in equilibrium with the clay is measured by the sensor.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, suction sensor calibration is not affected by soil type theoretically, because only water potential of the ceramic discs in equilibrium with the clay is measured by the sensor. Sensor limitations are listed for caution: (1) good hydraulic contact with the surrounding soil is required for suction sensor during measurement, (2) sensor reading is affected by temperature and applied supply voltage, and (3) hysteresis related to wetting and drying of ceramic discs would be reflected on suction data (Sreedeep and Singh, 2005, 2011; Tripathy et al., 2016). Volumetric water content and suction were measured by ProCheck (Decagon Devices, Inc., USA) with stable applied supply voltage under 25 ± 2 °C temperature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the major challenge in developing the SWCC of a given soil is the accurate measurement of the soil matric suction in the eld or in the laboratory. Techniques such as osmotic method (Delage et al 1998, Gapak et al 2017, Gapak and Tadikonda, 2018, chilled mirror hygrometer (Leong et al 2003), vapor equilibrium technique (Delage et al 1998 Recent studies showed that the continuous evaluation of transient suction data by xed-matrix porous ceramic disc sensor in a loose soil state is erroneous (Tripathy et al 2016, Karagoly et al 2018) due to insu cient hydraulic equilibrium time between the sensor disc and the soil. Thus, the stability analysis based on the instantaneous measurement of suction by tensiometer, a commonly used eld technique for riverbanks and slopes (Nam et al 2009), requires reevaluation of the applicability in a compacted state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%