2017
DOI: 10.1680/jgeen.16.00075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil–structure interaction in a combined pile–raft foundation – a case study

Abstract: The present work explains the use of a piled-raft foundation in a raw materials storage building in South Bà Rịa–Vũng Tàu Province of Vietnam. The proposed foundation comprises an 81 m by 55·5 m raft that connects 581 precast hollow concrete piles 20 m long with 400 mm outer diameter. The proposal takes into consideration a specific in situ soil profile and a loading scenario. After the effectiveness of a single bay of the foundation had been checked, the entire foundation system was modelled using finite-elem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3-D finite element model (100 m x 50 m x 20 m) is developed in PLAXIS 3D with its dynamic module using 10 noded tetrahedral elements. The model dimensions are chosen in a manner so as to avoid any boundary effects (Kumar et al 2017, Kumar andChoudhury 2018). Viscous boundaries are applied along the edges so as to account for the semi-infinite extent of the soil and prevent undue reflection of the waves along the boundaries (Kumar et al 2015(Kumar et al , 2016.…”
Section: Validation Of Present Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3-D finite element model (100 m x 50 m x 20 m) is developed in PLAXIS 3D with its dynamic module using 10 noded tetrahedral elements. The model dimensions are chosen in a manner so as to avoid any boundary effects (Kumar et al 2017, Kumar andChoudhury 2018). Viscous boundaries are applied along the edges so as to account for the semi-infinite extent of the soil and prevent undue reflection of the waves along the boundaries (Kumar et al 2015(Kumar et al , 2016.…”
Section: Validation Of Present Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the components were activated simultaneously with the assumption that the temple would be constructed, following the 'bottom-up' method. Similar methodology was adopted by Kumar et al (2017). The unit weight of the lumped mass was estimated using the schematic diagram of the temple received from ICOMOS Nepal.…”
Section: Details Of the Numerical Modelling And Input Parameters Undementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pile-soil-raft interaction According to Comodromos et al (2016), the resistance of a piled raft can be partitioned into three stages depending on the group settlement normalized by the pile diameter, Sng: 1. 0% < Sng < 1.5%: the resistance of both the piles and the raft are linear and the resistance contribution from the raft is insignificant and therefore commonly ignored (Mandolini and Viggiani 1997;Xu and Zhang 2007;Kumar et al 2017); 2. 1.5% < Sng < 4%: the piles exhibit up to ~90% of their limit capacity;…”
Section: Background: Pile Group Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%