2014
DOI: 10.4324/9781315844855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
91
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The first, used for casts, where material available was limited, was based on the MicroResp procedure [29], using a BioTek ELx808 plate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc, Swindon, UK) to monitor pH change (phenol red indicator) due to increasing dissolved CO 2 . The second method for soil aggregates was based on a static alkali trap procedure [30].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first, used for casts, where material available was limited, was based on the MicroResp procedure [29], using a BioTek ELx808 plate reader (BioTek Instruments, Inc, Swindon, UK) to monitor pH change (phenol red indicator) due to increasing dissolved CO 2 . The second method for soil aggregates was based on a static alkali trap procedure [30].…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La distribución granulométrica se realizó empleando la metodología propuesta por el Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (Black et al, 1965). La curva de retención de humedad del suelo, θ (h), se determinó combinando el método de la evaporación (Peters y Durner, 2008) con el método del extractor de presión (Rowell, 2014). El método de la evaporación se utilizó para determinar la retención de humedad en la zona húmeda de la curva (succiones entre 0 y 0.6 bar).…”
Section: Materiales Y Métodos Propiedades Del Suelo Utilizadounclassified
“…ESP values in some soil horizons were higher compared to other soils in Slovenia where the share of sodium ions on adsorption complex is less than 1 % (Prus, 2007). However negative effects on soil structure are less probable; ESP below 10 % or SAR below 13 % does not pose a risk to soil structure (Brady and Weil, 2002;Rowell, 1994). Additional protection for the soil structure was probably provided by high content of Ca 2+ ions in the soil.…”
Section: Soil Salinitymentioning
confidence: 99%