2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-022-10305-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil salinity assessment using electromagnetic induction method in a semi-arid environment — a case study in Tunisia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the majority of salinity profiles were found to be uniform (EMaH~EMaV), based on our findings. In addition to this, the vertical EM38 readings were higher than the horizontal ones, as also reflected by Slimane et al [55], which documented that the vertical readings were related to the water content of the whole profile. Gangrade [56] also performed EMI measurements and revealed that the coefficient of correlation for the water content ranged from 0.36 to 0.78, indicating a substantial link between the conductivity values and the water content.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the majority of salinity profiles were found to be uniform (EMaH~EMaV), based on our findings. In addition to this, the vertical EM38 readings were higher than the horizontal ones, as also reflected by Slimane et al [55], which documented that the vertical readings were related to the water content of the whole profile. Gangrade [56] also performed EMI measurements and revealed that the coefficient of correlation for the water content ranged from 0.36 to 0.78, indicating a substantial link between the conductivity values and the water content.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…5). Herrero et al [12] stated that the average ECe of the different depths of soils and ECaV and ECaH values displayed significant linear interactions, as also noted by the acceptable calibration equation of Slimane et al [55] based on depth-specific linear regression models with an average r 2 of roughly 0.78 that was found between the soil saturated extract conductivity and the EM38 data. Furthermore, the r 2 values of the calibration equations are slightly higher in flat cultivation compared to ridge cultivation for both vertical and horizontal readings.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Additionally, it embraces both deterministic and stochastic methods for the prediction of the spatial ECe values from the ECa survey data [71]. To date, several researchers have used the ESAP programs with EM38 readings as a tool to delineate and map ECe distribution at irrigated fields [71,[97][98][99] and district scales [100]. Amezketa [71], using customized ESAP software and EM38 data, assessed and displayed the spatial patterns of soil salinity at an irrigated plot in Spain.…”
Section: Deterministic and Stochastic Conversion Of Ecamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, based on the selected calibration models, the average ECe profile (0-90 cm) was mapped. Slimane et al [100], after obtaining EM38 readings from a 240 ha region of Tunisia, imported the data into the ESAP to determine the appropriate soil sampling locations and to estimate and map the spatial variability of the area's ECe. According to the study's results, the average R 2 of the prediction models for different soil depths was approximately 0.78, (0.6 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.8) and the ECe variation maps showed that salinity increased with depth.…”
Section: Deterministic and Stochastic Conversion Of Ecamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although EM38 and electromagnetic conductivity meter (CMD mini-explorer) devices are commonly employed for soil salinity mapping across various global locations [23][24][25][26], the use of the CMD2 device has been comparatively limited. Utili [27] employed the CMD2 device to establish a calibration relationship between water content and EC a to monitor water content in earthen embankments along the river Irvine in Galston, UK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%