2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0929-1393(00)00053-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil response to canopy position and feral pig disturbance beneath Quercus agrifolia on Santa Cruz Island, California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(39 reference statements)
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of significant soil disturbance-up to 33% of the area rooted every winter-boar rooting in our system reduced only soil compaction. Our findings, while surprising, are consistent with previous studies that showed idiosyncratic effects of rooting on soil properties and processes (Singer et al 1984, Groot Bruinderink and Hazebroek 1996, Moody and Jones 2000, Cushman et al 2004, Mohr et al 2005, Tierney and Cushman 2006, Siemann et al 2009). Two mechanisms might explain the absence of response of soil properties to rooting disturbance: soil resilience and the temporal scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In spite of significant soil disturbance-up to 33% of the area rooted every winter-boar rooting in our system reduced only soil compaction. Our findings, while surprising, are consistent with previous studies that showed idiosyncratic effects of rooting on soil properties and processes (Singer et al 1984, Groot Bruinderink and Hazebroek 1996, Moody and Jones 2000, Cushman et al 2004, Mohr et al 2005, Tierney and Cushman 2006, Siemann et al 2009). Two mechanisms might explain the absence of response of soil properties to rooting disturbance: soil resilience and the temporal scale.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In a fouryear experiment, Cushman et al (2004) found no evidence for an effect of pig disturbances on ammonium and nitrate pools and mineralization rates at our Salt Point study site. Similarly, Moody and Jones (2000) found no correlation between pig disturbances and changes in soil pH, moisture, nitrogen pools and total carbon for oak savannas on Santa Cruz Island, off the coast of southern California. In contrast, Kotanen (1997a) found that simulated disturbances in a coastal grassland in northern California had greater ammonium levels than undisturbed areas, although there was no effect for nitrate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Fewer studies have explored the influence of pig disturbances on soil characteristics, and results have been quite variable. For example, Singer (1984) found that pig disturbances in montane forests of the southeastern U.S. were associated with elevated nitrate levels, whereas Moody and Jones (2000) and Cushman et al (2004) found no such effects in grasslands and oak woodlands in California.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated soil C and nutrient availability and/or mineralization on grubbed and non-grubbed soil. They have found positive (Singer et al 1984), neutral (Groot Bruinderink andHazebroek 1996;Moody and Jones 2000;Cushman et al 2004;Mohr et al 2005;Tierney and Cushman 2006) or negative (Mohr and Topp 2001) eVects of wild boar grubbing in oak/oak-beech forests and grassland ecosystems as well as positive eVects of grizzly bear digging on NH 4 + -N and NO 3 ¡ -N availability in subalpine meadows (TardiV and Stanford 1998). Two of the studies listed above also provided data on microbial biomass (Mohr and Topp 2001;Mohr et al 2005) showing lower values for grubbed compared to nongrubbed loamy soils of dry oak forests located in the western part of Germany.…”
Section: Grubbing Evects On Soil Co 2 Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grubbing involves breaking through the vegetation and typically mixes the top 15-70 cm of the litter and mineral soil (Imeson 1977;Genov 1981;Kotanen 1995). Consequently, wild boars, like other bioturbators, strongly aVect soil physical, chemical and biological properties (review in Gabet et al 2003;Singer et al 1984;Lacki and Lancia 1986;Groot Bruinderink and Hazebroek 1996;Moody and Jones 2000;Sierra 2001;Mohr et al 2005), and have the potential to exert a considerable impact on the amount of CO 2 released from the soil.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%