1999
DOI: 10.1080/09064719950135560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Respiration in Three Soil Types in Agricultural Ecosystems in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8) and the positive correlation coefficient (r) varies from 0.64 to 0.81 with is significant for all eight measurement sites (non directional p b 0.001). The increased emission with temperature has also been noted in other studies such as Glenn et al (1993), Silvola et al (1996a), Akinremi et al (1998), Koizumi et al (1999), Maljanen et al (2001a,b). The CO 2 emission has variable negative correlation with soil moisture on average − 0.42 with significant correlation at sites Gb and A, −0.53 and −0.83 respectively.…”
Section: Green House Gas Emissionssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…8) and the positive correlation coefficient (r) varies from 0.64 to 0.81 with is significant for all eight measurement sites (non directional p b 0.001). The increased emission with temperature has also been noted in other studies such as Glenn et al (1993), Silvola et al (1996a), Akinremi et al (1998), Koizumi et al (1999), Maljanen et al (2001a,b). The CO 2 emission has variable negative correlation with soil moisture on average − 0.42 with significant correlation at sites Gb and A, −0.53 and −0.83 respectively.…”
Section: Green House Gas Emissionssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This could be attributed to the soil properties, the types of weed species and a better water use efficiency of individual weed families (Bolandnazar et al, 2007). Soil types influencing the abundance of plant communities are in conformity with most earlier research (Koizumi et al, 1999;Echevarria et al, 2003;Mako et al, 2008;Bestland et al, 2009;Clark et al, 2011; Figure 5 Mycorrhization of field pea roots at different soil types (gleyic phaeozem -F -soils , sandy calcaric phaeozem -S -soils and calcic chernozem -T -soils ), under current and prognosticated rainfall patterns. Means ± SD, n = 3.…”
Section: Effects Of Soil Typessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…S -soils are highly sandy, with very low profile water and evaporation; F -soils have very high clay content, highly mottled subsoils, with high profile water and evaporation; while T -soils are highly silty with the highest profile water content (Table 1). Soil types and its characteristics have been demonstrated to affect several processes in agroecosystems, such as the availability and supply of water to plants (Passioura, 1991), respiration and soil temperature (Koizumi et al, 1999), plant growth, vegetation cover and yield (Mako et al, 2008;Bestland et al, 2009;Genxu et al, 2009), the transfer and interaction of mineral nutrients (Echevarria et al, 2003;Matias et al, 2011), and the physical, chemical and biochemical properties of soils (Rhoton et al, 1993;Paz-Ferreiro et al, 2011), while higher soil sand content has been shown to improve AMF colonisation (Zaller et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial lowering of the water table generally increases the N 2 O emission rate but the long-term influence of drainage depth is not as straightforward (Regina et al, 1996;Maljanen et al, 2003c;Klemedtsson et al, 2005) Many investigations of GHG emissions from peat soils have been conducted under uncontrolled conditions in the field (Nykänen et al, 1995;Freeman et al, 1996;Silvola et al, 1996;Flessa et al, 1998) or on disturbed soil samples (Freeman et al, 1996;Aerts and Ludwig, 1997;Best and Jacobs, 1997;Chapman and Thurlow, 1998) where the original structure of the peat profile and its characteristic hydrological features are lost. Information on the peat soil profile and the properties of the soils has in many cases been lacking or insufficient (Freeman et al, 1996;Koizumi et al, 1999;Regina et al, 2004), which makes interpretation of the results difficult. An essential feature in this study is the emission measurements from intact soil cores together with the collection of associated soil property data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%