2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2022.106692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil quality assessment of reclaimed land in the urban–rural fringe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) The correlation analysis of indicators under the same PC in MDS is taken as follows: If the indicators are highly correlated (R > 0.5), the indicator with the highest norm value is retained; if not, all indicators are retained. ( 4) If an indicator appears in both PCs in the MDS, it is assigned to the set of PCs with the lower load value [51,52]. Norm, also known as the modulus vector, is a length indicator of the modulus vector in a multidimensional space.…”
Section: Determination Of the Mdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) The correlation analysis of indicators under the same PC in MDS is taken as follows: If the indicators are highly correlated (R > 0.5), the indicator with the highest norm value is retained; if not, all indicators are retained. ( 4) If an indicator appears in both PCs in the MDS, it is assigned to the set of PCs with the lower load value [51,52]. Norm, also known as the modulus vector, is a length indicator of the modulus vector in a multidimensional space.…”
Section: Determination Of the Mdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment established two datasets which were MDS and TDS to analyze the data, and TDS and MDS used principal component analysis (PCA) to analyze (Gewers et al, 2021; Li et al, 2023). The weights of TDS were determined by communities (Huang et al, 2021; Shao et al, 2020; Yu et al, 2018), and the weights of MDS were calculated by the ratio of the variance of each principal component to the cumulative variance of principal component with eigenvalues ≥1 (Rezaei et al, 2006; Santos‐Francés et al, 2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were three scoring functions for soil indicators, “more is better”, “less is better”, and “optimum is better”, respectively. It was considered that bulk density was to be as “less is better”, others were “more is better” (Li et al, 2023; Raiesi, 2017; Volchko et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCA was performed to analyze the data matrix of the selected soil properties above. Considering the principal components (PCs) contribution in the present study, only the PCs with an eigenvalue of more than 1 were considered meaningful and thus were chosen for selecting the key soil indicators in MDS [24,25]. In each chosen PC, the soil properties with a loading value of more than 90% of the highest loading value in the same PC were considered as the important soil indicators, and these important soil indicators were kept representing this PC in MDS.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LSM and NLSM were two commonly used scoring methods in SQ evaluation under different regions and different management practices, which could well reflect the function of soil indicators in SQ [24,25]. Therefore, the soil indicators selected in MDS were transformed into dimensionless scores (ranging from 0 to 1) using the LSM and nNLSM in the present study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%