Abstract:Saline‐sodic water is a by‐product of coalbed natural gas (CBNG) production in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming, USA and is being beneficially used in places as irrigation water. This study evaluated effects of 2 years of natural precipitation on soil properties of a hay field after the cessation of managed irrigation with CBNG water. The hay field had been irrigated with only CBNG water [CBNG(NT)], CBNG water amended with gypsum [CBNG(G)] or gypsum plus sulfur via a sulfur burner [CBNG(GSB)] in combination w… Show more
“…3). There is limited research on effects of S burner on soil chemistry, and available literature indicated that similar to the current study, application of S burner‐treated water increased the infiltration rate that resulted in reduced EC e and sodicity, especially in surface soils (Johnston et al, 2013). However, the maximum salinity and sodicity observed after 1 yr of irrigation with S burner‐treated (blended) water were still above the threshold.…”
Core Ideas
Salinity and sodicity in irrigated cotton fields are reducing soil productivity, lint yield, and fiber quality in arid and semiarid regions of the world.
Sulfur burner treatment of irrigation water can be used to tap native CaCO3 to produce CaSO4 in a safe manner.
Calcium sulfate increases Ca availability in the root zone to counter Na, improve soil permeability, and leach salts to deeper depths.
Salinity and sodicity are the dual problems affecting soil productivity, lint yield, and fiber quality in the irrigated pima cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fields in far west Texas. This field study evaluated the effects of S burner‐treated blended irrigation water on sodicity and salinity of the root zone, cotton lint yield, and fiber quality. Results indicated that pre‐study soil salinity and sodicity exceeded the threshold levels in many areas within the 9.2‐ha study site. One year of irrigation with S burner‐treated water resulted in 19% reduction in salinity of the upper 0‐ to 30‐cm depth and redistribution of salts at deeper depths. Average sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) of study site soils decreased by 3 to 5% at 0‐ to 15‐, 30‐ to 45‐, and 45‐ to 60‐cm depths and reduction in the SAR range for 15‐ to 30‐ and 60‐ to 75‐cm depths indicated redistribution of Na. Irrigation with S burner‐treated blended water increased annual cotton lint yield by 20% compared with long‐term average and improved fiber quality. However, 1 yr of irrigation with S burner‐treated water did not reduce the maximum soil ECe and SAR values below the threshold levels at different depths. Multi‐year studies are needed to confirm our results and quantify the duration required to restore soil quality, cotton yield, and fiber quality.
“…3). There is limited research on effects of S burner on soil chemistry, and available literature indicated that similar to the current study, application of S burner‐treated water increased the infiltration rate that resulted in reduced EC e and sodicity, especially in surface soils (Johnston et al, 2013). However, the maximum salinity and sodicity observed after 1 yr of irrigation with S burner‐treated (blended) water were still above the threshold.…”
Core Ideas
Salinity and sodicity in irrigated cotton fields are reducing soil productivity, lint yield, and fiber quality in arid and semiarid regions of the world.
Sulfur burner treatment of irrigation water can be used to tap native CaCO3 to produce CaSO4 in a safe manner.
Calcium sulfate increases Ca availability in the root zone to counter Na, improve soil permeability, and leach salts to deeper depths.
Salinity and sodicity are the dual problems affecting soil productivity, lint yield, and fiber quality in the irrigated pima cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) fields in far west Texas. This field study evaluated the effects of S burner‐treated blended irrigation water on sodicity and salinity of the root zone, cotton lint yield, and fiber quality. Results indicated that pre‐study soil salinity and sodicity exceeded the threshold levels in many areas within the 9.2‐ha study site. One year of irrigation with S burner‐treated water resulted in 19% reduction in salinity of the upper 0‐ to 30‐cm depth and redistribution of salts at deeper depths. Average sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) of study site soils decreased by 3 to 5% at 0‐ to 15‐, 30‐ to 45‐, and 45‐ to 60‐cm depths and reduction in the SAR range for 15‐ to 30‐ and 60‐ to 75‐cm depths indicated redistribution of Na. Irrigation with S burner‐treated blended water increased annual cotton lint yield by 20% compared with long‐term average and improved fiber quality. However, 1 yr of irrigation with S burner‐treated water did not reduce the maximum soil ECe and SAR values below the threshold levels at different depths. Multi‐year studies are needed to confirm our results and quantify the duration required to restore soil quality, cotton yield, and fiber quality.
“…Although sodicity (SAR) increased in the upper 45 cm, which covers the effective root zone of switchgrass in this study, the values were less than the sodic threshold of 13. However, even in the deeper depth (45–60 cm) soils that exceeded the threshold, no impairment in soil permeability was observed due to higher EC e values that helped to keep electrolyte concentration in the soil solution above the threshold electrolyte concentration (Johnston, Vance, & Ganjegunte, ). Toward the end of the study, solubilization and redistribution of native calcium minerals (calcite and gypsum) resulted in lowering of pH (G. Ganjegunte et al, ).…”
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of treated municipal wastewater irrigation on soil organic carbon (SOC), soil macronutrients, Na, Cl, and SO 4 dynamics in soil as well as switch-
“…In the last years, numerous studies have indicated that restoration needs to recover soil functionality, and this call is taking place all over the world (Ahmad et al, 2013;Johnston et al, 2013;Mao et al, 2014;Moreno et al, 2014;Novara et al, 2014;Roy and McDonald, 2015;Sacristán et al, 2015;Sadeghi et al, 2015;Srivastava et al, 2014). Some authors indicate that this task should be accomplished with a broad view by considering how soils can interfere with human health (Brevik and Sauer, 2015).…”
Section: N Seco-reigosa Et Al: Adsorption Desorption and Fractionamentioning
Abstract. As(V) adsorption and desorption were studied on granitic material, coarse and fine mussel shell and granitic material amended with 12 and 24 t ha −1 fine shell, investigating the effect of different As(V) concentrations and different pH as well as the fractions where the adsorbed As(V) was retained. As(V) adsorption was higher on fine than on coarse shell. Mussel shell amendment increased As(V) adsorption on granitic material. Adsorption data corresponding to the unamended and shell-amended granitic material were satisfactory fitted to the Langmuir and Freundlich models. Desorption was always < 19 % when the highest As(V) concentration (100 mg L −1 ) was added. Regarding the effect of pH, the granitic material showed its highest adsorption (66 %) at pH < 6, and it was lower as pH increased. Fine shell presented notable adsorption in the whole pH range between 6 and 12, with a maximum of 83 %. The shellamended granitic material showed high As(V) adsorption, with a maximum (99 %) at pH near 8, but decreased as pH increased. Desorption varying pH was always < 26 %. In the granitic material, desorption increased progressively when pH increased from 4 to 6, contrary to what happened to mussel shell. Regarding the fractionation of the adsorbed As(V), most of it was in the soluble fraction (weakly bound). The granitic material did not show high As(V) retention capacity, which could facilitate As(V) transfer to water courses and to the food chain in case of As(V) compounds being applied on this material; however, the mussel shell amendment increased As(V) retention, making this practice recommendable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.