1993
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1993.03615995005700010041x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Properties Associated with Landscape Position

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
112
4
15

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
112
4
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1 showed that TN displayed similar pattern to SOM. This similarity may be related to SOM influencing N retention and supply (Brubaker et al, 1993). Total N content with low variability (S.D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 1 showed that TN displayed similar pattern to SOM. This similarity may be related to SOM influencing N retention and supply (Brubaker et al, 1993). Total N content with low variability (S.D.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…1). Based on the six categories of landscape position including upper interfluve, lower interfluve, shoulder, upper linear, lower linear and foot slope used by Brubaker et al (1993Brubaker et al ( , 1994, we divided the hillslope into three positions, upper slope, middle slope and foot slope (Wang et al, 2001a). The upper slope position, relative to upper interfluve and lower interfluve, is the uppermost portion of the hillslope.…”
Section: Soil Sampling and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the leaf litter fall, 82Á9 per cent of this was hard decomposed needle leaf of slash pine and the decomposition of such litter could produce a great deal of organic acid (Yuan et al, 2003). Brubaker et al (1993) reported that soil organic matter could influence nutrient retention and supply. The similar trend between soil carbon and total nitrogen content may be the result of this.…”
Section: Litter Fallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vários autores correlacionaram o rendimento de culturas e algumas das variáveis físicas e/ou químicas do solo (MILLER et al, 1988e FIORIN et al, 1997 (BRUBAKER et al, 1993;TIMLIN et al, 1998). Pouca ou nenhuma importância é dada para a variabilidade da ação antrópica junto ao rendimento das culturas quando a agricultura de precisão é a área de interesse.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified