2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2017.11.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil pollution: Anthropogenic versus geogenic contributions over large areas of the Lazio region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geochemical background is considered to be an element or compound concentration unaffected by anthropogenic inputs (Baize & Sterckeman, 2001). The threshold value is defined as an upper limit without an anthropogenic influence (Matschullat et al, 2000;Taylor & Kesterton 2002;Reimann & Garrett, 2005).…”
Section: Geochemical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geochemical background is considered to be an element or compound concentration unaffected by anthropogenic inputs (Baize & Sterckeman, 2001). The threshold value is defined as an upper limit without an anthropogenic influence (Matschullat et al, 2000;Taylor & Kesterton 2002;Reimann & Garrett, 2005).…”
Section: Geochemical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies indicated that mining was a major source of PTEs [ 12 , 13 ] and rivers in the mining areas were the main medium to transport the pollutants. It has become increasingly important to distinguish between the geogenic and anthropogenic sources of these PTEs and to understand that the background values change depending on the area and the scale of the area investigated [ 14 ]. However, there were still few studies focused on the pollution levels of different sections of the river in mining areas [ 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that organic chemicals, trace metals, or metalloids, such as As, Cr, Cd, Ni, and Pb, would cause more environmental contamination. 14 Regular monitoring and publicizing of the results of the potentially toxic metal/element concentration in the aquatic environment related to a CFPP are not the usual practice in the region, and no similar research action has yet taken that approach. We postulated that there would exist particular trace element contamination in the abovementioned aquatic environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%