2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-013-1763-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil organic matter dynamics in density and particle-size fractions following destruction of tropical rainforest and the subsequent establishment of Imperata grassland in Indonesian Borneo using stable carbon isotopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these factors, soil depth is important in impacting C turnover time of soil fractions. We observed that at the same site, C turnover times of a given soil fraction generally increase with depth, regardless of the estimate method used (Skjemstad et al, 1990;Sch€ oning and K€ ogel-Knabner, 2006;Yonekura et al, 2013;Dalal et al, 2013;Beniston et al, 2014;Liang et al, 2014). This finding is consistent with other studies (Rumpel et al, 2002;Rumpel and K€ ogel-Knabner, 2011;Mathieu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among these factors, soil depth is important in impacting C turnover time of soil fractions. We observed that at the same site, C turnover times of a given soil fraction generally increase with depth, regardless of the estimate method used (Skjemstad et al, 1990;Sch€ oning and K€ ogel-Knabner, 2006;Yonekura et al, 2013;Dalal et al, 2013;Beniston et al, 2014;Liang et al, 2014). This finding is consistent with other studies (Rumpel et al, 2002;Rumpel and K€ ogel-Knabner, 2011;Mathieu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Variation in C turnover times results from different SOC protection mechanisms associated with soil particles as well as inconsistent methods used to estimate C turnover times (Bird et al, 2002;Tan et al, 2013;Yonekura et al, 2013;Beniston et al, 2014). Physically fractionated soil particles are often obtained according to soil aggregate size or soil texture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The POM fractions can be characterized using the distribution of carbon in different soil aggregate sizes (Yonekura et al, 2013). Physical fractionation methods are commonly used because they help in understanding the dynamics, structure and function of POM (Six et al, 2001;Olk & Gregorich, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the substantial number of studies that have analyzed the surface properties of larger particles, studies on detailed size distributions of surface properties in the soil clay fraction (<2 μm) are rather scarce. Nevertheless, many soil processes are determined by the nature of the clay fraction (Hillel, 1998;Kiem and Kögel-Knabner, 2002;Saggar et al, 1999;Wu et al, 2012;Yonekura et al, 2013). In this size fraction, soil particles within the nanoscale or colloidal range (< 1 μm) are vital and ubiquitous components in natural systems including soils, water, and atmospheric aerosol (Brunekreef and Russell, 2009;Schmidt, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%