2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.05.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil organic matter and the extracellular microbial matrix show contrasting responses to C and N availability

Abstract: An emerging paradigm in soil science suggests microbes can perform ‘N mining’ from recalcitrant soil organic matter (SOM) in conditions of low N availability. However, this requires the production of extracellular structures rich in N (including enzymes and structural components) and thus defies stoichiometric expectation. We set out to extract newly synthesised peptides from the extracellular matrix in soil and compare the amino acid (AA) profiles, N incorporation and AA dynamics in response to labile inputs … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…produces auxins (Yin et al, 2015), which support the root system of plants (Takahashi, 2013), and extracellular phosphatases (Pfeiffer, 1996), which exposes phosphorus to plants (Lee, 1988); Chlorella vulgaris helps to start initial bacterial growth (Cole, 1982;Watanabe et al, 2005); Azotobacter sp. produces extracellular biopolymers (Remminghorst and Rehm, 2006), which are necessary for aquaretence capacity cover Redmile-Gordon et al, 2015); while Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp.…”
Section: Biological Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…produces auxins (Yin et al, 2015), which support the root system of plants (Takahashi, 2013), and extracellular phosphatases (Pfeiffer, 1996), which exposes phosphorus to plants (Lee, 1988); Chlorella vulgaris helps to start initial bacterial growth (Cole, 1982;Watanabe et al, 2005); Azotobacter sp. produces extracellular biopolymers (Remminghorst and Rehm, 2006), which are necessary for aquaretence capacity cover Redmile-Gordon et al, 2015); while Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp.…”
Section: Biological Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, no studies are known to show an increase in microbial biomass due to contamination with Zn 2+ . The EPS production efficiencies in uncontaminated soils (also amended with glycerol and BCP) were previously found to depend on the C/N ratio of available substrates for microbial growth (Redmile-Gordon et al., 2015a). While the effect of Zn 2+ addition on EPS production efficiency per se (μg EPS nmol −1 microbial ATP, or μg EPS nmol −1 biomass C) was not an objective of the present study, the addition of excess Zn 2+ is highly unlikely to have increased the microbial biomass (again, as no soil studies have ever shown this), and so the clear increase in EPS and SMP production between soils given BCP and those given BCP plus Zn 2+ points towards microbial allocation of metabolites into Zn tolerance mechanisms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This step was repeated each day thereafter to simultaneously re-moisten the soil, remove excess substrate C from soil pores, and redistribute solutes as would occur in a more natural system exposed to weather in an open environment (Redmile-Gordon et al., 2015a). Dilute CaCl 2 is commonly used in preference to deionized water in soil laboratory studies as a surrogate for rainwater owing to osmotic similarity (Jalali and Rowell, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could probably be explained by pre-incubation of soil aggregates given 0.2 mM NH 4 NO 3 and further addition of NH 4 NO 3 with enzyme application: Redmile-Gordon et al (2015) proposed that low C / N ratios of substrates available to soil microorganisms reduce cell-specific EPS production rates and may trigger microbial consumption of EPSs to acquire C for cell-growth, which could weaken the biofilm. The observations leading to this proposed dynamic were also found by addition of NH 4 NO 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%