2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil organic carbon dynamics following natural vegetation restoration: Evidence from stable carbon isotopes (δ13C)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
62
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
5
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). Our results are in line with findings of increasing OM decomposition and C processing under afforested sites, but contrast a subsequent decrease of decomposition and turnover of OM under continuous forest ( Richter et al, ; Diochon et al, ; Deng et al, ). Hampered approximated OM decomposition at continuously forested sites was observed if beta values were calculated excluding the litter layer, suggesting a strong impact of the organic layer as baseline for our approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). Our results are in line with findings of increasing OM decomposition and C processing under afforested sites, but contrast a subsequent decrease of decomposition and turnover of OM under continuous forest ( Richter et al, ; Diochon et al, ; Deng et al, ). Hampered approximated OM decomposition at continuously forested sites was observed if beta values were calculated excluding the litter layer, suggesting a strong impact of the organic layer as baseline for our approach.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results show that vertical δ 13 C gradients can form within 30 y, similarly described in other studies ( Billings and Richter , ; Deng et al, ). According to our hypothesis, we found least developed δ 13 C depth profiles at arable sites and most developed δ 13 C depth profiles at continuously forested sites.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Given a set of soil quality indicators to assess the soil status in restored soils (Xu et al ; Muñoz‐Rojas et al ), the application of SR as an indicator of SOC sequestration and soil quality is meaningful and valuable for evaluating the effect of ecological restoration, because the condition of soils before restoration are never clear, and soil properties are inherently different in various eco‐regions, especially on the large spatial scales (Loescher et al ). Indicators of pooled SOC content and soil quality were strongly influenced by both historical condition and inherent difference of the soil (Deng et al ), hence, using these indicators to directly compare the effects of ecological restoration could lead to inaccurate conclusions (An et al ). SR normalizes the background differences of different eco‐regions or topographical conditions by including the properties of deeper soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, soil contains 1,500-2,300 Pg of organic C, approximately twice as much as the amount in the atmosphere and three times the amount in terrestrial vegetation (Lal, 2004). Therefore, it has an important role in regulating the atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentration (Briones, Ostle, & Garnett, 2006;Deng, Wang, Tang, & Shangguan, 2016). Minor variations in soil C pools can significantly change the global C cycle (Davidson & Janssens, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%