1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00108-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil organic C in the tallgrass prairie-derived region of the corn belt: effects of long-term crop management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
104
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
9
104
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Annual inputs from agriculture to more recalcitrant SOM pools as compared to that derived from native vegetation have often been reported to be minimal (Balesdent et al, 1990;Huggins et al, 1998;Poirier et al, 2006). Contributing factors are reductions in quantity of annual C inputs, decreases in recalcitrant inputs (e.g., lignin), and/or increases in disturbance or erosion that result from a switch from native to agricultural conditions (Hassink, 1997;Huggins et al, 1998;Krull et al, 2003). In part, this may explain why management factors, particularly tillage and cropping intensity, were not very significant factors influencing soil C and N properties as compared to MAT and MAP across the four study sites (Table 3).…”
Section: Future Climate: Soil C and N Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual inputs from agriculture to more recalcitrant SOM pools as compared to that derived from native vegetation have often been reported to be minimal (Balesdent et al, 1990;Huggins et al, 1998;Poirier et al, 2006). Contributing factors are reductions in quantity of annual C inputs, decreases in recalcitrant inputs (e.g., lignin), and/or increases in disturbance or erosion that result from a switch from native to agricultural conditions (Hassink, 1997;Huggins et al, 1998;Krull et al, 2003). In part, this may explain why management factors, particularly tillage and cropping intensity, were not very significant factors influencing soil C and N properties as compared to MAT and MAP across the four study sites (Table 3).…”
Section: Future Climate: Soil C and N Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop residue return to the soil is essential for maintaining soil fertility and soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in agroecosystems (Huggins et al 1998;Paustian et al 1997;Follett 2001) and increasing the amount of residue returned to the soil results in greater SOC stocks (Huggins et al 1998). Climate change scenarios predict an increase in mean annual temperature with an increase in precipitation variability that will likely result in lower SOC stocks in semiarid regions due to decreased residue returned to the soil either from crop water stress (CAST 2011) and decreased crop productivity or from flooding and subsequent crop failure (Follett et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a shift from high physical disturbance conventional tillage (CT) to reduced tillage (RT) to no-tillage (NT) can increase SOC storage (Allmaras et al 2000;Huggins et al 2007). Crop rotations that increase carbon (C) inputs from roots and residues can also increase the storage of SOC (Huggins et al 1998;Huggins et al 2007).In addition to SOC storage, reduction of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions also contributes to mitigate the climate impact of agriculture. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency (2011), agriculture contributes 7.4% of total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States, with approximately 70% due to N 2 O production from agricultural soil management (e.g., nitrogen [N] fertilizer).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%