Abstract:Grasslands play a critical role in the global carbon (C) cycle, covering a quarter of the Earth's land surface and contributing up to 20% to the total terrestrial C sink (Xia et al., 2014). As with most ecosystems, C accumulation in grasslands reflects the balance and seasonal variation of C inputs via photosynthesis (gross primary production, GPP) and C emissions from respiration by microbes, plants and animals (ecosystem respiration, ER). Observational studies and field experiments manipulating food webs hav… Show more
“…2014; Dybzinski & Tilman, 2007;Eskelinen et al, 2022). Previous work in this experiment found that more biomass is allocated above than belowground following nutrient addition pointing to a potential shift in competition for light (Zaret et al, 2023). Overall forbs had the largest range of responses to consumer and nutrient manipulations and C4 grasses the least (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Under higher resource scenarios, consumers are predicted to have modified impacts on plant hosts due to a variety of mechanisms ranging from modified susceptibility or immunity in plants to herbivory or infection (Smith, 2007) as well as microbes and herbivores changing consumption strategies and preference among hosts under increased nutrients (Peters et al, 2006). Previous work in this system shows amplified foliar fungal and arthropod impacts on plant biomass in fertilized plots (Zaret et al, 2023), suggesting that a shift toward poorly defended species following nutrient addition (reflecting the growth-defense trade-off) has implications for ecosystem processes such as carbon cycling. Studies integrating defense trade-offs and ecosystem processes in the context of global changes such as increasing nutrient supplies would help clarify this knowledge gap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most plants in this system are perennial and changes in biomass are predominantly due to vegetative growth. The community is dominated by C4 and C3 grasses, forbs, and legumes with a mean aboveground biomass of approximately 200 g m −2 (Zaret et al, 2023). Plant communities at this site experience high levels of pathogen damage relative to other grasslands F I G U R E 1 Environmental manipulations reveal defense trade-offs among grassland plant species.…”
Plants face trade‐offs between allocating resources to growth, while also defending against herbivores or pathogens. Species differences along defense trade‐off axes may promote coexistence and maintain diversity. However, few studies of plant communities have simultaneously compared defense trade‐offs against an array of herbivores and pathogens for which defense investment may differ, and even fewer have been conducted in the complex natural communities in which these interactions unfold. We tested predictions about the role of defense trade‐offs with competition and growth in diversity maintenance by tracking plant species abundance in a field experiment that removed individual consumer groups (mammals, arthropods, fungi) and added nutrients. Consistent with a growth–defense trade‐off, plant species that increased in mass in response to nutrient addition also increased when consumers were removed. This growth–defense trade‐off occurred for all consumer groups studied. Nutrient addition reduced plant species richness, which is consistent with trade‐off theory. Removing foliar fungi increased plant diversity via increased species evenness, whereas removal of other consumer groups had little effect on diversity, counter to expectations. Thus, while growth–defense trade‐offs are general across consumer groups, this trade‐off observed in wild plant communities does not necessarily support plant diversity maintenance.
“…2014; Dybzinski & Tilman, 2007;Eskelinen et al, 2022). Previous work in this experiment found that more biomass is allocated above than belowground following nutrient addition pointing to a potential shift in competition for light (Zaret et al, 2023). Overall forbs had the largest range of responses to consumer and nutrient manipulations and C4 grasses the least (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Under higher resource scenarios, consumers are predicted to have modified impacts on plant hosts due to a variety of mechanisms ranging from modified susceptibility or immunity in plants to herbivory or infection (Smith, 2007) as well as microbes and herbivores changing consumption strategies and preference among hosts under increased nutrients (Peters et al, 2006). Previous work in this system shows amplified foliar fungal and arthropod impacts on plant biomass in fertilized plots (Zaret et al, 2023), suggesting that a shift toward poorly defended species following nutrient addition (reflecting the growth-defense trade-off) has implications for ecosystem processes such as carbon cycling. Studies integrating defense trade-offs and ecosystem processes in the context of global changes such as increasing nutrient supplies would help clarify this knowledge gap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Most plants in this system are perennial and changes in biomass are predominantly due to vegetative growth. The community is dominated by C4 and C3 grasses, forbs, and legumes with a mean aboveground biomass of approximately 200 g m −2 (Zaret et al, 2023). Plant communities at this site experience high levels of pathogen damage relative to other grasslands F I G U R E 1 Environmental manipulations reveal defense trade-offs among grassland plant species.…”
Plants face trade‐offs between allocating resources to growth, while also defending against herbivores or pathogens. Species differences along defense trade‐off axes may promote coexistence and maintain diversity. However, few studies of plant communities have simultaneously compared defense trade‐offs against an array of herbivores and pathogens for which defense investment may differ, and even fewer have been conducted in the complex natural communities in which these interactions unfold. We tested predictions about the role of defense trade‐offs with competition and growth in diversity maintenance by tracking plant species abundance in a field experiment that removed individual consumer groups (mammals, arthropods, fungi) and added nutrients. Consistent with a growth–defense trade‐off, plant species that increased in mass in response to nutrient addition also increased when consumers were removed. This growth–defense trade‐off occurred for all consumer groups studied. Nutrient addition reduced plant species richness, which is consistent with trade‐off theory. Removing foliar fungi increased plant diversity via increased species evenness, whereas removal of other consumer groups had little effect on diversity, counter to expectations. Thus, while growth–defense trade‐offs are general across consumer groups, this trade‐off observed in wild plant communities does not necessarily support plant diversity maintenance.
“…Grazing by livestock influences the productivity and stability of grassland ecosystems, which in turn generates feedback mechanisms on the carbon cycle. However, the factors underlying the complex changes of vegetation and soil as a result of grazing and their impact on the processes underlying carbon cycling remain poorly understood (Yuanet al 2011;Hussain et al 2015;Oram et al 2023;Zaret et al 2023). Our results from a 16-year long grazing intensity manipulation study in a desert steppe grassland show that grazers alter patterns of net ecosystem exchange primarily via their negative influence on the biomass of shrub and semi-shrub, which play a prominent role in ecosystem functions.…”
Livestock grazing can strongly determine how grasslands function and
their role in carbon cycle. However, how ecosystem carbon exchange
responds to grazing and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We
measured ecosystem carbon fluxes to explore the changes in carbon
exchange and their driving mechanisms in a 16-year long term experiment
with different grazing intensities in a desert steppe grassland. We
found that grazing intensity influenced above- and belowground biomass
during the peak growing season, primarily by decreasing shrubs and
semi-shrubs and perennial forbs. Furthermore, alter patterns of net
ecosystem exchange primarily via their negative influence on the biomass
of shrub and semi-shrub. In addition, grazing-induced reduction
belowground biomass, as well as in total plant nitrogen and soil
ammonium nitrogen, can strongly influence ecosystem carbon exchange and
soil respiration. When nitrogen is lost from the soil due to grazing,
plants reallocate resources belowground to maintain growth and
development, thus promoting photosynthesis and respiration. Our study
indicates that soil available nitrogen and shrubs and semi-shrubs are
important factors in regulating ecosystem carbon exchange under grazing
disturbance in the desert steppe, which provide a basis for grazing
management.
“…Heterotrophs include herbivores, predators, scavengers, and pathogens. Previous studies showed that the removal of arthropods and foliar fungi increased plant biomass [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], while the removal of soil fungi increased the forb biomass in grassland systems [ 11 ]. Removing foliar fungi also increased the biomass of trees in forest systems [ 12 ].…”
(1) Background: Heterotrophs can affect plant biomass and alter species diversity–productivity relationships. However, these studies were conducted in systems with a low nitrogen (N) availability, and it is unclear how heterotroph removal affects the relationship between plant species diversity and productivity in different N habitats. (2) Methods: Three typical understory herbaceous plants were selected to assemble the plant species diversity (three plant species richness levels (1, 2, and 3) and seven plant species compositions), and the control, insecticide, fungicide, and all removal treatments were performed at each plant species diversity level in systems with or without N addition treatments. (3) Results: In systems without N addition, the insecticide treatment increased the plant aboveground biomass, total biomass, and leaf area, while the fungicide treatment reduced the plant belowground biomass, root length, and root tip number; the presence of Bidens pilosa increased the plant aboveground biomass. Similarly, the presence of Bletilla striata increased the plant belowground biomass and root diameter under each heterotroph removal treatment. In systems with N addition, all removal treatments reduced the plant belowground biomass and increased the plant leaf area; the presence of B. pilosa significantly increased the plant aboveground biomass, total biomass, and root length under each heterotroph removal treatment. The presence of B. striata significantly increased the plant belowground biomass and leaf area under insecticide and fungicide treatments. (4) Conclusions: Heterotroph removal alters the plant species diversity–biomass relationship by affecting the plant functional traits in systems with different N availabilities. The impact of biodiversity at different trophic levels on ecosystem functioning should be considered under the background of global change.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.