2022
DOI: 10.1007/s42991-021-00203-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil nutrients and deer density affect antler size of the Carpathian red deer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the estimates of wild prey (males + females + offspring) between 2015 and 2017 from 22 hunting grounds (20–75 km 2 ) within our study areas to spatially map the average annual red deer, wild boar and roe deer population density ( Fig 2A and S1 Table ). Data on the abundance of wild ungulates in Slovakia was probably not as reliable as scientific surveys of wild ungulates, but since relative differences were important for this analysis, like in Smolko et al [ 69 , 70 ], we were confident in rough estimates of wild ungulate abundance. Densities of wild ungulates in our study areas ranged between 1.3–1.9 ind./km 2 for red deer, 1.1–2.0 ind./km 2 for roe deer and 0.4–0.7 ind./km 2 for wild boar ( Fig 2A ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We used the estimates of wild prey (males + females + offspring) between 2015 and 2017 from 22 hunting grounds (20–75 km 2 ) within our study areas to spatially map the average annual red deer, wild boar and roe deer population density ( Fig 2A and S1 Table ). Data on the abundance of wild ungulates in Slovakia was probably not as reliable as scientific surveys of wild ungulates, but since relative differences were important for this analysis, like in Smolko et al [ 69 , 70 ], we were confident in rough estimates of wild ungulate abundance. Densities of wild ungulates in our study areas ranged between 1.3–1.9 ind./km 2 for red deer, 1.1–2.0 ind./km 2 for roe deer and 0.4–0.7 ind./km 2 for wild boar ( Fig 2A ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We used the estimates of wild prey (males + females + offspring) between 2015 and 2017 from 22 hunting grounds (20 – 75 km2) within our study areas to spatially map the average annual red deer, wild boar and roe deer population density (Fig 2a; S1 Table). Data on the abundance of wild ungulates in Slovakia was probably not as reliable as scientific surveys of wild ungulates, but since relative differences were important for this analysis, like in Smolko et al [69,70], we were confident in rough estimates of wild ungulate abundance. Densities of wild ungulates in our study areas ranged between 1.3 – 1.9 ind./km 2 for red deer, 1.1 – 2.0 ind./km 2 for roe deer and 0.4 – 0.7 ind./km 2 for wild boar (Fig 2a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…hunting grounds (20 -75 km 2 ) within our study areas to spatially map the average annual red deer, wild boar and roe deer population density (Fig 2a; S1 Table). Data on the abundance of wild ungulates in Slovakia was probably not as reliable as scientific surveys of wild ungulates, but since relative differences were important for this analysis, like in Smolko et al[69,70], we were confident in rough estimates of wild ungulate abundance. Densities of wild ungulates in our pastures from April to November[48], being usually under the constant supervision of shepherds with guarding dogs during the day and kept inside enclosures at night.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%