2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2011.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: An intercomparison and validation study across Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
355
3
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 509 publications
(389 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
25
355
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In RUSLE2, runoff prediction for storm events is obtained using the SCS-CN method with empirical equations that vary the values of CN in association with both soil moisture and rainfall intensity (Kinnell, 2014). Todisco et al (2012b) evaluated the efficiency of the MISDc model (Modello idrologico semidistribuito in continuo, Brocca et al, 2011a), coupled with an USLE-derived model, for the estimation of surface runoff and soil loss at the event timescale at Masse experimental station. The model performance is found to be promising, but it was underlined that the antecedent soil moisture proved to be a good alternative with respect to runoff for correcting the rainfall-runoff erosivity factor in the USLE-MM model.…”
Section: F Todisco Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In RUSLE2, runoff prediction for storm events is obtained using the SCS-CN method with empirical equations that vary the values of CN in association with both soil moisture and rainfall intensity (Kinnell, 2014). Todisco et al (2012b) evaluated the efficiency of the MISDc model (Modello idrologico semidistribuito in continuo, Brocca et al, 2011a), coupled with an USLE-derived model, for the estimation of surface runoff and soil loss at the event timescale at Masse experimental station. The model performance is found to be promising, but it was underlined that the antecedent soil moisture proved to be a good alternative with respect to runoff for correcting the rainfall-runoff erosivity factor in the USLE-MM model.…”
Section: F Todisco Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reader is referred to Wagner et al (1999) for more details on the SWI approach. Lastly, the data were converted in volumetric units (m 3 m −3 ) through a linear rescaling approach (Brocca et al, 2011b) for matching the range of variability of satellite and modeled soil moisture data provided by the SWBM. The AS-CAT data for the pixel closest to the Masse study area were used.…”
Section: Soil Moisture From Satellite Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bu yöntem doyma oranları ile geri saçılım değerleri arasında kuvvetli bir ilişki olduğu varsayımı üzerine kuruludur ve aradaki değişimler için doğrusal interpolasyon yapılarak toprak nemi değerleri bulunmaktadır. ASCAT kaynaklı toprak nemi değerlerinin diğer toprak nemi değerleri ile karşılaştırılması şu ana kadar birçok çalışmada yapılmıştır [18,19]. Bu ürün için ayrıntılı bilgi [20,21] çalışmalarında mevcuttur.…”
Section: Ascat Uydu Kaynaklı Toprak Nemiunclassified
“…Several studies have demonstrated soil moisture estimation from space using passive microwave (e.g., [2][3][4][5]) and active microwave (scatterometer) (e.g., [4,6,7]) at a coarse (25-150 km) spatial resolution. On the other hand, active microwave SAR data have been successfully used to retrieve the soil moisture at a finer (less than 100 m) spatial resolution but with a coarse (approximately 3 weeks) temporal resolution [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%