2002
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2002.806994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil moisture estimation from ERS/SAR data: toward an operational methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
73
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen in Table 3 that the optimal values for the shape and compactness parameters have less variation than the scale parameter for the studied areas. The variation intervals are [0-0.2], [0.4-0.6], and [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] for the shape, compactness, and scale parameters, respectively. Object size and consequently the scale parameter appears to have wider variations than those of the shape parameters in the five study areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen in Table 3 that the optimal values for the shape and compactness parameters have less variation than the scale parameter for the studied areas. The variation intervals are [0-0.2], [0.4-0.6], and [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] for the shape, compactness, and scale parameters, respectively. Object size and consequently the scale parameter appears to have wider variations than those of the shape parameters in the five study areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sensors are well-suited for soil moisture estimation at regional and global scales. Although active sensors, such as ERS, RADARSAT, ASAR/ENVISAT, PALSAR/ALOS, TerraSAR-X, and Cosmo-SkyMed, are appropriate for soil moisture estimations at a high spatial resolution (better than 30 m) to provide a diagnosis suited to agricultural watershed areas, their accuracy is not as high as the passive sensors [11][12][13][14][15]. Recently, operational monitoring of soil moisture was made possible by the launch of the Sentinel-1 satellite in regular temporal coverage (6 days for Europe when both the A and B satellites are considered) together with a spatial resolution of 10 m and at no cost to the users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to agricultural areas, measurements have been performed on contrasting surfaces (bare soil and vegetated fields), allowing the distinction between the parameters related to soil and those related to crops. Following the soil contribution, influences from different levels of topsoil moisture, surface roughness and texture on backscattering coefficients have been widely analyzed since the 1980s [15][16][17][18][19][20] showing the importance of the sensor configurations (wavelength, incidence angle or polarization states). Studies addressing the sensitivities of vegetation parameters are mainly based on data acquired during specific phenological stages, at local scale [16,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, extensive studies have been conducted to retrieve soil moisture by using mono-or multi-polarization C-band SAR data (e.g. Alvarez-Mozos et al, 2006Baghdadi et al, 2002aBaghdadi et al, , 2006aRahman et al, 2008;Le Hégarat et al, 2002;Lievens et al, 2011;Mattia et al, 2009;Moran et al, 2004;Paloscia et al, 2008;Satalino et al, 2002;Srivastava et al, 2003;Zribi and Deschambre, 2002). The availability of RADARSAT-2 data (C-band, ∼5.3 GHz) should enable improvements and increase the ability to retrieve soil parameters, based on RADARDAT's capability of providing images in full polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%