Recent Advances in Acarology 1979
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-592201-2.50085-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Mite Community Diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of forest removal and cultivation on macrocoleoptera leads to a clear gradient of diversity from undisturbed to most disturbed areas (Table 4). Lebrun (1979) has produced a useful review of the ecological effects of agricultural practices on soil fauna. Natural disturbances, like the annual inundation of tropical forest soils by river flooding also creates low diversity communities (Irmler, 1979).…”
Section: Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of forest removal and cultivation on macrocoleoptera leads to a clear gradient of diversity from undisturbed to most disturbed areas (Table 4). Lebrun (1979) has produced a useful review of the ecological effects of agricultural practices on soil fauna. Natural disturbances, like the annual inundation of tropical forest soils by river flooding also creates low diversity communities (Irmler, 1979).…”
Section: Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, Luxton ( 1972) feels that while laboratory studies are necessarily somewhat artificial, they have provided useful information. Lebrun (1979), on the other hand, doubts whether laboratory studies on diet choice give much reliable information as to nutritional specificity, (a view with which Mitchell & Parkinson (1976) agree) and he feels that the best indicators are analyses of gut contents and observations in the field. The trouble is, as Woodring (1963) notes, that a given species in likely to feed on different foods in different habitats and areas, so that one cannot always assume, with certain notable exceptions, that the food in the gut is the only kind of food on which the species feeds or that the species will be found only where that particular food exists.…”
Section: Culture-feeding Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of investigating the association of oribatid mites with both micro-and macroflora lies in the fact that these mites play an important role in soil energetics and soil fertility (Kates & Runkel, 1948;Waksman, 1952;Ghilarov, 1963Ghilarov, , 1965Berthet, 1964;Witkamp & Crossley, 1966;Tarman, 1974;Krivolutzky, 1976;Crossley, 1977;Reichle, 1977;Lebrun, 1979). The Oribatei contribute to humus formation not only by the direct consumption and break up of fallen plant material and of fungal-decayed litter, but also by eating and distributing fungi and their spores (Forsslund, 1939;Witkamp, 1960;Kevan, 1962;Woodring & Cook, 1962;Macfadyen, 1964Macfadyen, , 1968Luxton, 1966a;Wallwork, 1972a;Mitchell & Parkinson, 1976;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypothesis seems to be confirmed, first by the fact that we know that niche divergence among species mainly arises from behavioral differences between adults that must permanently explore their environment to discover feeding sites (Lebrun, 1979) and second by recent data on feeding habits of oribatids in their environment (Rockett, 1980;Behan-Pelletier & Hill, 1983); but, of course, as in the case of morphological traits (Grandjean, 1949), there are apparently some exceptions (Seniczak & Stefaniak, 1978). Anyhow, we lack knowledge of the substances which actually are absorbed through the digestive tract (basically, these substances are the "variable" substrates of enzymes as discussed above), and we do not know how micro-organisms inhabiting the digestive tract interfere to elaborate these substances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%