2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42089-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil Loss, Productivity and Cropland Values GIS-Based Analysis and Trends in the Basilicata Region (Southern Italy) from 1980 to 2013

Abstract: Abstract. This paper concerns the trends assessment of the productivity values and croplands values of specific crops (cereals (arable cereals land), vineyards, olive-growing lands) in the Basilicata region at regional scale, from 1980 to 2013, in relation to the soil loss evaluated through the USPED method. The comparative analysis shows the interrelations between the soil loss by erosion and the economic value deriving from the erosive phenomenon affecting the croplands considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the RUSLE equation might give some extremely high values, and lead into an overestimation of erosion [26]. For example, previous studies in the southern Italy shown that the RUSLE model tend to amplify and emphasize the measured data, and the mean values of sediment yield from the Tu index (mean annual suspended sediment yield) and USPED (Unit Stream Power Erosion Deposition) method for the sub basins are very close and comparable, whereas the sediment yield coming from RUSLE method is much higher [48][49][50]. Thus, while the use of the RUSLE model evaluated the actual soil erosion of the study area, it should be supported by experimental measurements to reach a more objective analysis in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, the RUSLE equation might give some extremely high values, and lead into an overestimation of erosion [26]. For example, previous studies in the southern Italy shown that the RUSLE model tend to amplify and emphasize the measured data, and the mean values of sediment yield from the Tu index (mean annual suspended sediment yield) and USPED (Unit Stream Power Erosion Deposition) method for the sub basins are very close and comparable, whereas the sediment yield coming from RUSLE method is much higher [48][49][50]. Thus, while the use of the RUSLE model evaluated the actual soil erosion of the study area, it should be supported by experimental measurements to reach a more objective analysis in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The change from agrarian to urban land use represents a classical example of plus-value generation due to an expansive planning process [30,31]. On such occasions the revenue's-costs ratio registers a strong improvement, due to the difference between the ex ante and ex post land value.…”
Section: Matrix Of Land Value Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantity of farm land is important not only in terms of loss of the landscape value (that countryside still preserves in Italy), or in terms of the "filter-function" of farms considered as buffer zones between urban and natural environments [11]. [12].…”
Section: The Loss Of Farmlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%