2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil ingestion rate determination in a rural population of Alberta, Canada practicing a wilderness lifestyle

Abstract: The inadvertent ingestion of contaminated soil can be a major pathway for chemical exposure to humans. Few studies to date have quantified soil ingestion rates to develop exposure estimates for human health risk assessments (HHRA), and almost all of those were for children in suburban/urban environments. Here we employed a quantitative mass balance tracer approach on a rural population practicing outdoor activities to estimate inadvertent soil ingestion. This study followed 9 subjects over a 13 day period in C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil concentration was the highest BaP equivalent concentration measured at Cold Lake (Figure 1), IR values were from Cold Lake soil ingestion study [22], and the exposure frequency is 153 days. The mean risk level is 1.82E-7, and the 95% risk level is 6.72E-7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The soil concentration was the highest BaP equivalent concentration measured at Cold Lake (Figure 1), IR values were from Cold Lake soil ingestion study [22], and the exposure frequency is 153 days. The mean risk level is 1.82E-7, and the 95% risk level is 6.72E-7.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil ingestion rates used to calculate the dose were determined through a First Nations soil ingestion study conducted over a 13 day period at Cold Lake [22]. Deterministic assessments to assess lifetime cancer risk through ingestion of soil were conducted using Eq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the doses of reference published in the Integrated Risk Information System [25] of the United States for As (3 x 10 -4 mg/kg-d for oral exposure), and considering an ingestion of 32 mg soil/d [26], through a hand to mouth mechanism and considering a mean weight in Mexican male population of 77.7 kg [27], there is low potential risk to the population of Parral since the exposure is from 15 to 396 times smaller than the dose of reference. However, there is risk cancer through inhalation.…”
Section: Risk Estimation From Exposure To Bioaccessible Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the SIR for each subject over the study period is calculated using the median of the SIRs estimated by four tracers with the lowest F/S ratios. Recently, Doyle and colleagues used a higher number of tracers, including radionuclides, to quantify a child’s SIR with the tracer mass-balance method ( Doyle et al 2012a ; Irvine et al 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%