2018
DOI: 10.5194/hess-22-2551-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soil hydraulic material properties and layered architecture from time-lapse GPR

Abstract: Abstract. Quantitative knowledge of the subsurface material distribution and its effective soil hydraulic material properties is essential to predict soil water movement. Groundpenetrating radar (GPR) is a noninvasive and nondestructive geophysical measurement method that is suitable to monitor hydraulic processes. Previous studies showed that the GPR signal from a fluctuating groundwater table is sensitive to the soil water characteristic and the hydraulic conductivity function. In this work, we show that the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the temporal variability of the soil water content can be characterized from time-lapse measurements. For instance, GPR data can be collected during artificial experiments (e.g., infiltration, runoff, drainage, imbibition) that can provide interesting information on the flow characteristics (e.g., Saintenoy et al, 2008;Moysey, 2010;Scholer et al, 2011;Busch et al, 2013;Jonard et al, 2015;Jaumann and Roth, 2018;Léger et al, 2014;2020). Note however that the hydraulic properties estimated from GPR data are subject to an inherent compromise between a deep investigation and a fine spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the temporal variability of the soil water content can be characterized from time-lapse measurements. For instance, GPR data can be collected during artificial experiments (e.g., infiltration, runoff, drainage, imbibition) that can provide interesting information on the flow characteristics (e.g., Saintenoy et al, 2008;Moysey, 2010;Scholer et al, 2011;Busch et al, 2013;Jonard et al, 2015;Jaumann and Roth, 2018;Léger et al, 2014;2020). Note however that the hydraulic properties estimated from GPR data are subject to an inherent compromise between a deep investigation and a fine spatial resolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is the coupled inverse modeling of hydrological processes and GPR measurements. The model for the simulation of the propagation of the electromagnetic wave in the soils is computationally expensive but necessary for full waveform inversion (e.g., Lambot et al, 2009;Busch et al, 2012;Jadoon et al, 2012) or other evaluation approaches (e.g., Buchner et al, 2012;Jaumann and Roth, 2018). The other approach directly uses the evaluated soil water content and depth from GPR measurements in the inverse hydrological modeling, similar to the above-mentioned 1-D inversion using point observations, e.g., time-domain reflectometer (TDR) measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is the coupled inverse modeling of hydrological processes and GPR measurements. The model for the simulation of the propagation of the electromagnetic wave in the soils is computationally expensive but necessary for full waveform inversion (e.g., Lambot et al, 2009;Busch et al, 2012;Jadoon et al, 2012) or other evaluation approaches (e.g., Buchner et al, 2012;Jaumann & Roth, 2018). The other approach is directly using the evaluated soil water content and depth from GPR measurements in the inverse hydrological modeling, similar to the above mentioned 1D inversion using point observations, e.g., TDR measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%